From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: reinette chatre Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2010-05-28 Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 09:22:41 -0700 Message-ID: <1275409361.2091.27208.camel@rchatre-DESK> References: <20100528180952.GC2405@tuxdriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "John W. Linville" , "davem@davemloft.net" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Zheng, Jiajia" , "Kolekar, Abhijeet" , "Berg, Johannes" To: "sedat.dilek@gmail.com" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hi Sedat, On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 06:34 -0700, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Two people confirmed the patch in [2] fixes: > 1. iwlwifi-2.6 GIT master (commit f10a237c95abd6d64a3a24553bd1d3bcddd9108b) > 2. compat-wireless (2010-05-21) > > And it fixes also the above mentionned combination. We are working on getting this patch upstream. The version tested contains a significant amount of duplicated code as well as some cleanup code mixed in. It is thus not appropriate for an upstream submission at this time. > As a suggestion: > What about "copying" bug-reports (incl. its history) from IWL-BTS into > linux-wireless ML? > For example (dri-devel related) bug-reports from > bugzilla.freedesktop.org are "copied" into dri-devel ML. Pointing people to the bug report seems to work ok. What benefit does the above have? Reinette