From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pktgen: receive packets and process incoming rate Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 15:00:50 +0200 Message-ID: <1275483650.2725.173.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <4C06453B.1080801@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, robert@herjulf.net, jens.laas@its.uu.se To: Daniel Turull Return-path: Received: from mail-ww0-f46.google.com ([74.125.82.46]:45229 "EHLO mail-ww0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756305Ab0FDUzn (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jun 2010 16:55:43 -0400 Received: by wwb28 with SMTP id 28so1192781wwb.19 for ; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 13:55:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C06453B.1080801@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le mercredi 02 juin 2010 =C3=A0 13:49 +0200, Daniel Turull a =C3=A9crit= : > This patch adds receiver part to pktgen taking advantages of SMP syst= ems > with multiple rx queues: > - Creation of new proc file /proc/net/pktgen/pgrx to control and dis= play the receiver. > - It uses PER-CPU variable to store the results per each CPU. > - Results displayed per CPU and aggregated. > - The packet handler is add in the protocols handlers (dev_Add_pack()= ) > - Available statistics: packets and bytes received, work time and rat= e > - Only process pktgen packets > - It is possible to select the incoming interface=20 > - Documentation updated with the new commands to control the receiver= part. >=20 Interesting, but does it belongs to pktgen ? other comments included :) > Signed-off-by: Daniel Turull >=20 > =20 > +/*Recevier parameters per cpu*/ > +struct pktgen_rx { > + u64 rx_packets; /*packets arrived*/ unsigned long rx_packets ? > + u64 rx_bytes; /*bytes arrived*/ > + > + ktime_t start_time; /*first time stamp of a packet*/ > + ktime_t last_time; /*last packet arrival */ > +}; > +int pktgen_rcv_basic(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, > + struct packet_type *pt, struct net_device *orig_dev) > +{ > + /* Check magic*/ > + struct iphdr *iph =3D ip_hdr(skb); > + struct pktgen_hdr *pgh; > + void *vaddr; =46ollowing code is ... well ... interesting... But ... 1) Is it IPV6 compatable ? pktgen can be ipv6 or ipv4 2) Is it resistant to malicious packets ? (very small ones) 3) No checksum ? I think you should use standard mechanisms... (pskb_may_pull(), ...) Take a look at __netpoll_rx() for an example. > + if (skb_is_nonlinear(skb)) { > + vaddr =3D kmap_skb_frag(&skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[0]); > + pgh =3D (struct pktgen_hdr *) > + (vaddr+skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[0].page_offset); > + } else { > + pgh =3D (struct pktgen_hdr *)(((char *)(iph)) + 28); > + } > + > + if (unlikely(pgh->pgh_magic !=3D PKTGEN_MAGIC_NET)) > + goto end; > + > + if (unlikely(!__get_cpu_var(pktgen_rx_data).rx_packets)) > + __get_cpu_var(pktgen_rx_data).start_time =3D ktime_now(); > + > + __get_cpu_var(pktgen_rx_data).last_time =3D ktime_now(); > + Its a bit suboptimal to use __get_cpu_var several time. Take a look at disassembly code :) Use a pointer instead > + /* Update counter of packets*/ > + __get_cpu_var(pktgen_rx_data).rx_packets++; > + __get_cpu_var(pktgen_rx_data).rx_bytes +=3D skb->len+14; This +14 seems suspect (what about vlan tags ?) Use ETH_HLEN instead at a very minimum? > +end: > + if (skb_is_nonlinear(skb)) > + kunmap_skb_frag(vaddr); Should not recognised packets be allowed to flight in other parts of kernel stack ? This way, we could use ssh to remotely control this pktgen session ;) > + kfree_skb(skb); > + return 0; > +} > +