From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: alexander.h.duyck@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: add additional lock to qdisc to increase throughput
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 16:52:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1275490370.2725.178.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100602.051019.180420492.davem@davemloft.net>
Le mercredi 02 juin 2010 à 05:10 -0700, David Miller a écrit :
> From: "Duyck, Alexander H" <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
> Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 13:04:20 -0700
>
> > Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >> Tests with following script gave a boost from ~50.000 pps to ~600.000
> >> pps on a dual quad core machine (E5450 @3.00GHz), tg3 driver.
> >> (A single netperf flow can reach ~800.000 pps on this platform)
> >>
> >> for j in `seq 0 3`; do
> >> for i in `seq 0 7`; do
> >> netperf -H 192.168.0.1 -t UDP_STREAM -l 60 -N -T $i -- -m 6 &
> >> done
> >> done
> >
> > Running the same script with your patch my results went from 200Kpps to 1.2Mpps on a dual Xeon 5570.
> >
> > Acked-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
>
> Applied, thanks guys.
Thanks David, I realize you did all the necessary changes after
qdisc_run_begin/qdisc_is_running/ integration ;)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-02 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-23 20:25 [RFC PATCH] net: add additional lock to qdisc to increase enqueue/dequeue fairness Alexander Duyck
2010-03-23 20:31 ` David Miller
2010-03-24 2:12 ` Andi Kleen
2010-03-23 20:40 ` Rick Jones
2010-03-23 20:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-03-23 21:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-03-23 21:45 ` David Miller
2010-03-23 22:08 ` Duyck, Alexander H
2010-03-24 2:58 ` David Miller
2010-03-24 5:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-03-24 6:10 ` David Miller
2010-03-23 22:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-21 15:43 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-05-21 16:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-21 17:38 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-05-21 17:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-02 9:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-02 9:49 ` [PATCH 1/2 net-next-2.6] net: Define accessors to manipulate QDISC_STATE_RUNNING Eric Dumazet
2010-06-02 10:24 ` David Miller
2010-06-02 9:50 ` [PATCH 2/2 net-next-2.6] net: QDISC_STATE_RUNNING dont need atomic bit ops Eric Dumazet
2010-06-02 10:25 ` David Miller
2010-03-24 14:24 ` [RFC PATCH] net: add additional lock to qdisc to increase enqueue/dequeue fairness Eric Dumazet
2010-05-21 15:08 ` [PATCH] net: add additional lock to qdisc to increase throughput Eric Dumazet
2010-05-21 20:04 ` Duyck, Alexander H
2010-06-02 12:10 ` David Miller
2010-06-02 14:52 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1275490370.2725.178.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox