From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luciano Coelho Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] netfilter: Xtables: idletimer target implementation Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 22:52:28 +0300 Message-ID: <1275508348.2797.26.camel@powerslave> References: <1275486062-23753-1-git-send-email-luciano.coelho@nokia.com> <1275503835.1574.0.camel@powerslave> <1275505553.2797.2.camel@powerslave> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org" , "kaber@trash.net" , Timo Teras To: ext Jan Engelhardt Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 21:29 +0200, ext Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Wednesday 2010-06-02 21:05, Luciano Coelho wrote: > >> > >+ idletimer_tg_kobj = kobject_create_and_add("idletimer", > >> > >+ &THIS_MODULE->mkobj.kobj); > >> > > >> > Isn't this going to oops when you compile this module as =y? > >> > >> Damn, that's true. :( > >> > >> I'll investigate how to fix this. > > > >Would it be too hacky to force it to be a module (ie. add "depends on m" > >in Kconfig)? > > > >Besides /sys/module/xt_IDLETIMER and /sys/class/net, which we have > >already discarded, I can't find any other place that would make sense to > >add the idletimer in the kernel object hierarchy... > > While THIS_MODULE is NULL in =y mode, /sys/module/ can still exist > (cf. /sys/module/printk). I just don't know how to get at the kobj for > it, but the existence of it must mean it's there somewhere. Might ask > sysfs authors. Okay, good to know. My initial theory was that /sys/module/xt_IDLETIMER (pointed to by THIS_MODULE) would exist even if it was linked into the kernel itself, but now it's obvious that it doesn't. I'll investigate how printk does that. -- Cheers, Luca.