netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
To: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] act_cpu: redirect skb receiving to a special CPU.
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 10:26:44 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1275748004.3490.86.camel@bigi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim83nfQDuLNmYAvk6RBqxot0t6cGq-lbic4-DSs@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, 2010-06-05 at 22:15 +0800, Changli Gao wrote:

> For instance: there are 4 CPUs. I want redirect traffic to CPU 1-3
> evenly. If the qdisc is linear the rules as
> 
> flow classify(flow classid ffff:2-4) | tc_index 2 action cpu 1 |
> tc_index 3 action cpu 2 | tc_index 4 action cpu3
> 
> a tree variant:
> 
> class ffff:1 : flow classify(flow classid ffff:2-4)
> class ffff:2 parent ffff:1 : action cpu 1
> class ffff:3 parent ffff:1 : action cpu 2
> class ffff:4 parent ffff:1 : action cpu 3
> 
> ingress_classify: use flow classify to get the subclass ID, then find
> the corresponding class and exec action.
> 
> When there are lots of CPUs, tree is more efficient.

I still didnt follow .. 
Even if i had a million CPUs, A classifier matches some filter
and an action already bound to filter is executed. So the expensive
part is the classifier lookup.

> It seems AMD specific. Why do the AMD guys use this to implement async
> smp_call_function() if it is useful as you said?

Indeed it is AMD specific - but my view is if i was using AMD that would
be more efficient way of doing it; i.e IPI is the lowest common
denominator which works on all archs. Essentially what i am saying is
this would be a "inter-cpu messaging netdev" and i could replace its
send/recv parts from what we do in the RPS path right now to one that
uses AMD hypertransport etc.

cheers,
jamal


  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-05 14:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-05 10:56 [RFC] act_cpu: redirect skb receiving to a special CPU Changli Gao
2010-06-05 13:07 ` jamal
2010-06-05 13:26   ` Changli Gao
2010-06-05 13:54     ` jamal
2010-06-05 14:15       ` Changli Gao
2010-06-05 14:26         ` jamal [this message]
2010-06-05 15:00           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-07  8:43       ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1275748004.3490.86.camel@bigi \
    --to=hadi@cyberus.ca \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=therbert@google.com \
    --cc=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).