From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 v2] pkt_sched: gen_estimator: kill est_lock rwlock Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 14:27:32 +0200 Message-ID: <1276000052.2475.307.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <20100608121546.GA9392@ff.dom.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Changli Gao , David Miller , netdev , Stephen Hemminger , Patrick McHardy To: Jarek Poplawski Return-path: Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:51236 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754972Ab0FHM1h (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2010 08:27:37 -0400 Received: by wyi11 with SMTP id 11so3146260wyi.19 for ; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 05:27:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100608121546.GA9392@ff.dom.local> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le mardi 08 juin 2010 =C3=A0 12:15 +0000, Jarek Poplawski a =C3=A9crit = : >=20 > Actually, I guess, Changli meant the bug introduced by your previous > patch by removing the est_lock. With this lock (and your commit 5d944= ) > bstats (and API) seem "fundamentaly" safe. >=20 Sorry, I have no idea of what you want to say, I cant find commit 5d944= =2E