From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: RFS seems to have incompatiblities with bridged vlans Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 06:42:33 +0200 Message-ID: <1276058553.2439.469.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <62C40338-045A-417E-9B90-E59A320E1343@dlh.net> <20100607145910.2458ac87@nehalam> <4C0D7312.1020300@intel.com> <1276006721.2486.141.camel@edumazet-laptop> <4C0ED931.6030402@canonical.com> <4C0EE99B.8030300@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: "tim.gardner@canonical.com" , Tom Herbert , Stephen Hemminger , Peter Lieven , "davem@davemloft.net" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" To: John Fastabend Return-path: Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:41831 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751106Ab0FIEmj (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2010 00:42:39 -0400 Received: by wyf28 with SMTP id 28so614867wyf.19 for ; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 21:42:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C0EE99B.8030300@intel.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le mardi 08 juin 2010 =C3=A0 18:08 -0700, John Fastabend a =C3=A9crit : >=20 > The bonding driver is already multiq per Andy Gospodarek's patch comm= it bb1d912,=20 > but unless the bond and bridge devices use the max num_rx_queues of t= here=20 > underlying devices this could still go wrong. >=20 This patch is in net-next-2.6, it is not scheduled for 2.6.35 We need some fix for 2.6.35 > The bonding driver would possibly need to increase num_rx_queues and=20 > num_tx_queues when a device is enslaved or be set to some maximum at = init for=20 > this to work right. Thats a bit complex and definitly not 2.6.35 material.