From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: tim.gardner@canonical.com
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.35-rc2, CONFIG_RPS is filling the dmesg log
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 17:27:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1276097246.2442.186.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C0FB1D3.60901@canonical.com>
Le mercredi 09 juin 2010 à 09:22 -0600, Tim Gardner a écrit :
> On 06/09/2010 07:42 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Le mercredi 09 juin 2010 à 07:27 -0600, Tim Gardner a écrit :
> >> On 06/08/2010 02:55 PM, Tim Gardner wrote:
> >>> With 2.6.35-rc2 my dmesg log is being flooded with messages like this:
> >>>
> >>> br0 received packet on queue 4, but number of RX queues is 1
> >>>
> >>> This machine is bridged for KVM and has 2 igb network adapters.
> >>>
> >>> The root cause appears to be CONFIG_RPS=y and the fact that none of the
> >>> drivers that call skb_record_rx_queue() perform their net device
> >>> allocation using alloc_netdev_mq(), thereby initializing num_rx_queues
> >>> to a maximum of 1.
> >>>
> >>> Given that this is early RPS days, is the warning in get_rps_cpu()
> >>> really necessary? It would appear that _all_ of the multi-receive queue
> >>> devices that call skb_record_rx_queue() will cause this log noise.
> >>>
> >>> By the way, how do you turn off CONFIG_RPS? The only way I could get it
> >>> disabled was to change the default in net/Kconfig to 'n'.
> >>>
> >>> rtg
> >>
> >> This is the route that I'm taking with Ubuntu in the short term. I'll
> >> have lots of server testers complaining pretty soon if I don't take care
> >> of this now. It does keep my server logs from filling.
> >>
> >> rtg
> >>
> >
> > Probably fine, but your commit message is not exact :
> >
> > So far no users of skb_record_rx_queue() use alloc_netdev_mq() for
> > network device initialization, so don't print a warning about num_rx_queues
> > imbalances in get_rps_cpu() unless they have actually been allocated.
> >
> > In fact, drivers that use skb_record_rx_queue() did use alloc_netdev_mq().
> >
> > Problem is : packets going thru bridge/bonding that are not yet
> > multiqueue enabled. If R[PF]S enabled for these "virtual devices",
> > we trigger the get_rps_cpu() warning.
> >
> > Also, in a bonding setup, we still have a problem
> > because all tx packets will go thru tx queue 0 (dev_pick_tx() job)
> >
> > (That might be good to know that for Ubuntu server testers)
> >
>
> How about this?
>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Thanks !
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-09 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-08 20:55 2.6.35-rc2, CONFIG_RPS is filling the dmesg log Tim Gardner
2010-06-09 13:27 ` Tim Gardner
2010-06-09 13:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-09 15:22 ` Tim Gardner
2010-06-09 15:27 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1276097246.2442.186.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tim.gardner@canonical.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox