From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH] fragment: add fast path Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 08:40:37 +0200 Message-ID: <1276497637.2478.1.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <1276470995-21713-1-git-send-email-xiaosuo@gmail.com> <1276493743.2448.41.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "David S. Miller" , Alexey Kuznetsov , "Pekka Savola (ipv6)" , James Morris , Hideaki YOSHIFUJI , Patrick McHardy , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Changli Gao Return-path: Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:52152 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751253Ab0FNGkl (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jun 2010 02:40:41 -0400 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so3460917wyb.19 for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 23:40:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1276493743.2448.41.camel@edumazet-laptop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > I am not sure why we need "struct inet_skb_parm h;" field in struct > ipfrag_skb_cb... > > I probably need to wakeup this monday morning ? > > Untested patch follows, only compiled. > Oh well, I see light now I woke up ;) > [PATCH] frags: Remove unecessary bits > > While trying to move 'offset' to the beginning of frag CB, I found > inet_skb_parm field was unused. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet > --- Wrong patch of course. We need some comment or document better why its there..