From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Shan Wei <shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] ip_frag: Remove some atomic ops
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:18:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1276525084.2478.92.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C163622.7080003@cn.fujitsu.com>
Le lundi 14 juin 2010 à 22:01 +0800, Shan Wei a écrit :
> Eric Dumazet wrote, at 06/14/2010 05:02 PM:
> > Instead of doing one atomic operation per frag, we can factorize them.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
>
> IPv6 netfilter has implemented owns queue to manage/reassemble defragments.
> So, you miss this one.
>
Not exactly missed, its only a different thing :)
I prefer to separate if possible net patches (David) and netfilter ones
(Patrick), because of delay between git trees.
> [PATCH 1/2] netfilter: defrag: remove one redundant atomic ops
>
> Instead of doing one atomic operation per frag, we can factorize them.
> Reported from Eric Dumazet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shan Wei <shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
> ---
> net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c | 3 +--
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c
> index 6fb8901..bc5b86d 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c
> @@ -442,7 +442,6 @@ nf_ct_frag6_reasm(struct nf_ct_frag6_queue *fq, struct net_device *dev)
> skb_shinfo(head)->frag_list = head->next;
> skb_reset_transport_header(head);
> skb_push(head, head->data - skb_network_header(head));
> - atomic_sub(head->truesize, &nf_init_frags.mem);
>
> for (fp=head->next; fp; fp = fp->next) {
> head->data_len += fp->len;
> @@ -452,8 +451,8 @@ nf_ct_frag6_reasm(struct nf_ct_frag6_queue *fq, struct net_device *dev)
> else if (head->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_COMPLETE)
> head->csum = csum_add(head->csum, fp->csum);
> head->truesize += fp->truesize;
> - atomic_sub(fp->truesize, &nf_init_frags.mem);
> }
> + atomic_sub(head->truesize, &nf_init_frags.mem);
>
> head->next = NULL;
> head->dev = dev;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-14 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-14 9:02 [PATCH net-next-2.6] ip_frag: Remove some atomic ops Eric Dumazet
2010-06-14 14:01 ` Shan Wei
2010-06-14 14:18 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-06-14 14:30 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-06-16 1:13 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1276525084.2478.92.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox