From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Hutchings Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Fix error in comment on net_device_ops::ndo_get_stats Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 23:24:03 +0100 Message-ID: <1276640643.14011.558.camel@localhost> References: <1276528781.2074.0.camel@achroite.uk.solarflarecom.com> <20100615.151040.191416638.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail.solarflare.com ([216.237.3.220]:17399 "EHLO exchange.solarflare.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751833Ab0FOWYI (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:24:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100615.151040.191416638.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 15:10 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Ben Hutchings > Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:19:41 +0100 > > > ndo_get_stats still returns struct net_device_stats *; there is > > no struct net_device_stats64. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings > > Applied. > > But, I am ignoring every single patch you submit from here on > out that lacks a proper "net-2.6" or "net-next-2.6" destination > tree indication in your Subject line. > > I've asked this of you at least 3 times, and you seem content to just > ignore my request. But that's OK, as I think you'll stop ignoring > me when it starts causing patches you care about to be dropped. > > Thanks :-) Sorry Dave, I thought net-next-2.6 was still the default and I only needed to make it more obvious when I wanted patches to go to net-2.6. I've added the suffix to my git configuration now. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.