Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] inetpeer: do not use zero refcnt for freed entries
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:56:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1276678609.2632.13.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100615.214754.42801686.davem@davemloft.net>

Le mardi 15 juin 2010 à 21:47 -0700, David Miller a écrit :
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 04:45:24 +0200
> 
> > [PATCH net-next-2.6] inetpeer: do not use zero refcnt for freed entries
> > 
> > Followup of commit aa1039e73cc2 (inetpeer: RCU conversion)
> > 
> > Unused inet_peer entries have a null refcnt.
> > 
> > Using atomic_inc_not_zero() in rcu lookups is not going to work for
> > them, and slow path is taken.
> > 
> > Fix this using -1 marker instead of 0 for deleted entries.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
> 
> Applied, thanks Eric.

Thanks

With 65537 peers and a DDOS frag attack, I now get following profiling
results :

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   PerfTop:    1024 irqs/sec  kernel:100.0%  exact:  0.0% [1000Hz
cycles],  (all, cpu: 0)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

             samples  pcnt function                  DSO
             _______ _____ _________________________ 

             7722.00 65.6% inet_frag_find            
             1355.00 11.5% ip4_frag_match            
              494.00  4.2% __lock_acquire            
              260.00  2.2% inet_getpeer              
              243.00  2.1% ip_route_input_common     
              151.00  1.3% lock_release              
              142.00  1.2% mark_lock                 
              126.00  1.1% lock_acquire              
              104.00  0.9% __kmalloc                 
               86.00  0.7% skb_put                   


Just to show what could be the next steps ;)






  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-16  8:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-15 18:23 [PATCH net-next-2.6] inetpeer: RCU conversion Eric Dumazet
2010-06-15 21:25 ` David Miller
2010-06-16  2:45   ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] inetpeer: do not use zero refcnt for freed entries Eric Dumazet
2010-06-16  4:47     ` David Miller
2010-06-16  8:56       ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-06-16 18:12     ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1276678609.2632.13.camel@edumazet-laptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox