From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 v2] net: Introduce u64_stats_sync infrastructure Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 19:31:06 +0200 Message-ID: <1277227866.3057.709.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <1276598605.2541.96.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20100615110413.GJ6138@laptop> <1276608594.2541.119.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20100622.102455.232729115.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: npiggin@suse.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bhutchings@solarflare.com To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:42209 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759068Ab0FVRbM (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:31:12 -0400 Received: by wyi11 with SMTP id 11so59018wyi.19 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:31:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100622.102455.232729115.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le mardi 22 juin 2010 =C3=A0 10:24 -0700, David Miller a =C3=A9crit : > That's a really weird patch hunk for a newly added file. >=20 > The hunk header is saying that the new file start 1 line > in. Which doesn't make any sense, and GIT reject this > saying that you're trying to make a modification to a > file which doesn't exist. >=20 > I applied this by hand, but I really wonder how you managed > to create such a patch :-) Now you mention it, I remember I had problems about this newly added file, and had to use several git commands to stabilize my tree. I really dont know what happened exactly, sorry :!) Thanks !