From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Hutchings Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 5/5] sfc: Record hardware RX hash on each skb where possible Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 16:18:28 +0100 Message-ID: <1277392708.2100.3.camel@achroite.uk.solarflarecom.com> References: <1277328447.2101.7.camel@achroite.uk.solarflarecom.com> <1277328688.2101.12.camel@achroite.uk.solarflarecom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from exchange.solarflare.com ([216.237.3.220]:59921 "EHLO exchange.solarflare.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754149Ab0FXPSc (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:18:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1277328688.2101.12.camel@achroite.uk.solarflarecom.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: David, Unfortunately, this version of the patch can hit a hardware bug that results in bogus hashes. Let me know whether you've applied it, and I'll send an incremental or a replacement patch. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.