From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfrm bugs with mark logic Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 18:59:24 +0200 Message-ID: <1278089964.2530.42.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <1278082898.2530.37.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20100702162403.GA10809@myhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Kosyh Return-path: Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:49101 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753231Ab0GBQ73 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jul 2010 12:59:29 -0400 Received: by wyf23 with SMTP id 23so1238870wyf.19 for ; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 09:59:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100702162403.GA10809@myhost> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le vendredi 02 juillet 2010 =C3=A0 20:24 +0400, Peter Kosyh a =C3=A9cri= t : > >=20 > > Hi Peter > >=20 > > XFRMA_MARK part already in net-2.6 tree : > >=20 > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=3Dlinux/kernel/git/davem/net-2.6.git;a=3Dc= ommit;h=3D4efd7e833591721bec21cc4730a7f6261417840f > >=20 > > Please submit another patch the second problem you spotted ? > >=20 >=20 > Yes, i see. Here it is, but i am little unsure about ipv6 fix. >=20 Seems fine, but please read Documentation/SubmittingPatches to submit a= n official patch. Thanks !