From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vlan: allow TSO setting on vlan interfaces Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 18:04:39 +0200 Message-ID: <1278605079.2651.37.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <1278522874.5906.9.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1278523511.2080.3.camel@achroite.uk.solarflarecom.com> <1278571587.2543.9.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1278581971.2651.10.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1278603804.16013.24.camel@achroite.uk.solarflarecom.com> <1278604198.16013.35.camel@achroite.uk.solarflarecom.com> <4C35F4E4.4070606@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Ben Hutchings , David Miller , netdev To: Patrick McHardy Return-path: Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:33945 "EHLO mail-ww0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754126Ab0GHQEq (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jul 2010 12:04:46 -0400 Received: by wwb24 with SMTP id 24so3984930wwb.1 for ; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 09:04:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C35F4E4.4070606@trash.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le jeudi 08 juillet 2010 =C3=A0 17:55 +0200, Patrick McHardy a =C3=A9cr= it : > I agree. The VLAN driver should also propagate feature changes > upwards itself. I noticed bonding is also at fault in this area. bond0.xxx are not noticed of TSO changes on bond0