From: leitao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
To: mchan@broadcom.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Breno Leitão" <leitao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] bnx2: Enable MSI-X even if the amount of vectors is smaller than BNX2_MAX_MSIX_VEC
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:42:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1279053766-8079-1-git-send-email-leitao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
First of all, the function bnx2_enable_msix() has the msix_vecs parameter,
but it's not used to request the amount of vectors. Currently the drivers is
always requesting BNX2_MAX_MSIX_VEC vectors, even when the msix_vecs is
different from it.
Also, if the amount of available vectors are smaller than BNX2_MAX_MSIX_VEC,
the MSI-X is disabled, which is something bad.
So, this patch tries to fix both issues. Now if the available amount of vectors
is smaller than the requested amount, the driver re-request the current available
amount and proceed with these vectors.
Signed-off-by: Breno Leitão <leitao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
drivers/net/bnx2.c | 16 +++++++++-------
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bnx2.c b/drivers/net/bnx2.c
index 1174322..70ee664 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bnx2.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bnx2.c
@@ -860,7 +860,7 @@ bnx2_alloc_mem(struct bnx2 *bp)
bnapi->hw_rx_cons_ptr =
&bnapi->status_blk.msi->status_rx_quick_consumer_index0;
if (bp->flags & BNX2_FLAG_MSIX_CAP) {
- for (i = 1; i < BNX2_MAX_MSIX_VEC; i++) {
+ for (i = 1; i < bp->irq_nvecs; i++) {
struct status_block_msix *sblk;
bnapi = &bp->bnx2_napi[i];
@@ -4886,7 +4886,7 @@ bnx2_init_chip(struct bnx2 *bp)
bnx2_reg_wr_ind(bp, BNX2_RBUF_CONFIG3, BNX2_RBUF_CONFIG3_VAL(mtu));
memset(bp->bnx2_napi[0].status_blk.msi, 0, bp->status_stats_size);
- for (i = 0; i < BNX2_MAX_MSIX_VEC; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < bp->irq_nvecs; i++)
bp->bnx2_napi[i].last_status_idx = 0;
bp->idle_chk_status_idx = 0xffff;
@@ -5007,7 +5007,7 @@ bnx2_clear_ring_states(struct bnx2 *bp)
struct bnx2_rx_ring_info *rxr;
int i;
- for (i = 0; i < BNX2_MAX_MSIX_VEC; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < bp->irq_nvecs; i++) {
bnapi = &bp->bnx2_napi[i];
txr = &bnapi->tx_ring;
rxr = &bnapi->rx_ring;
@@ -6148,13 +6148,15 @@ bnx2_enable_msix(struct bnx2 *bp, int msix_vecs)
msix_ent[i].vector = 0;
}
- rc = pci_enable_msix(bp->pdev, msix_ent, BNX2_MAX_MSIX_VEC);
- if (rc != 0)
- return;
+ do {
+ rc = pci_enable_msix(bp->pdev, msix_ent, msix_vecs);
+ if (rc > 0)
+ msix_vecs = rc;
+ } while (rc > 0);
bp->irq_nvecs = msix_vecs;
bp->flags |= BNX2_FLAG_USING_MSIX | BNX2_FLAG_ONE_SHOT_MSI;
- for (i = 0; i < BNX2_MAX_MSIX_VEC; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < msix_vecs; i++) {
bp->irq_tbl[i].vector = msix_ent[i].vector;
snprintf(bp->irq_tbl[i].name, len, "%s-%d", dev->name, i);
bp->irq_tbl[i].handler = bnx2_msi_1shot;
--
1.6.0.2
next reply other threads:[~2010-07-13 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-13 20:42 leitao [this message]
2010-07-13 19:40 ` [PATCH] bnx2: Enable MSI-X even if the amount of vectors is smaller than BNX2_MAX_MSIX_VEC Michael Chan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1279053766-8079-1-git-send-email-leitao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=leitao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).