Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] dst: check if dst is freed in dst_check()
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 04:28:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1279679288.2492.15.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C457120.9070105@6wind.com>

Le mardi 20 juillet 2010 à 11:49 +0200, Nicolas Dichtel a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> I probably missed something, but I cannot find where obsolete field is checked 
> when dst_check() is called. If dst->obsolete is > 1, dst cannot be used!
> 
> Attached is a proposal to fix this issue.
> 
> 

> diff --git a/include/net/dst.h b/include/net/dst.h
> index 81d1413..7bf4f9a 100644
> --- a/include/net/dst.h
> +++ b/include/net/dst.h
> @@ -319,6 +319,8 @@ static inline int dst_input(struct sk_buff *skb)
>  
>  static inline struct dst_entry *dst_check(struct dst_entry *dst, u32 cookie)
>  {
> +	if (dst->obsolete > 1)
> +		return NULL;
>  	if (dst->obsolete)
>  		dst = dst->ops->check(dst, cookie);
>  	return dst;

I believe this is not needed and redundant.

In what case do you think this matters ?

To my knowledge dst_check() is only used by net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c

And xfrm_dst_check() does the necessary checks.

static struct dst_entry *xfrm_dst_check(struct dst_entry *dst, u32 cookie)
{
        /* Code (such as __xfrm4_bundle_create()) sets dst->obsolete
         * to "-1" to force all XFRM destinations to get validated by
         * dst_ops->check on every use.  We do this because when a
         * normal route referenced by an XFRM dst is obsoleted we do
         * not go looking around for all parent referencing XFRM dsts
         * so that we can invalidate them.  It is just too much work.
         * Instead we make the checks here on every use.  For example:
         *
         *      XFRM dst A --> IPv4 dst X
         *
         * X is the "xdst->route" of A (X is also the "dst->path" of A
         * in this example).  If X is marked obsolete, "A" will not
         * notice.  That's what we are validating here via the
         * stale_bundle() check.
         *
         * When a policy's bundle is pruned, we dst_free() the XFRM
         * dst which causes it's ->obsolete field to be set to a
         * positive non-zero integer.  If an XFRM dst has been pruned
         * like this, we want to force a new route lookup.
         */
        if (dst->obsolete < 0 && !stale_bundle(dst))
                return dst;

        return NULL;
}



  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-21  2:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-20  9:49 [RFC PATCH] dst: check if dst is freed in dst_check() Nicolas Dichtel
2010-07-21  2:28 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-07-21  6:41   ` David Miller
2010-07-21  7:03   ` Nicolas Dichtel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1279679288.2492.15.camel@edumazet-laptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox