From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Franchoze Eric <franchoze@yandex.ru>
Cc: wensong@linux-vs.org, lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: LVS on local node
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 08:56:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1279781811.2405.15.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <27901279770680@web67.yandex.ru>
Le jeudi 22 juillet 2010 à 07:51 +0400, Franchoze Eric a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to do load balancing of incoming traffic to my applications. This applications are not very smp friendly, and I want try to run some instances according to number of cpus on single machine. And balance load of incoming traffic/connections to this applications.
> Looks like is should be similar to http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.localnode.html
>
> linux kernel 2.6.32 with or without hide interface patches. Tried different configurations but could not see packets on application layer.
>
> 192.168.1.165 - eth0 - interface for external connections
> 195.0.0.1 - dummy0 - virtual interface, real application is binded to that address.
>
> Configuration is:
> -A -t 192.168.1.165:1234 -s wlc
> -a -t 192.168.1.165:1234 -r 195.0.0.1:1234 -g -w
>
> #ipvsadm -L -n
> IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096)
> Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
> -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
> TCP 192.168.1.165:1234 wlc
> -> 195.0.0.1:1234 Local 1 0 0
> #
>
> Log:
> [ 2106.897409] IPVS: lookup/out TCP 192.168.1.165:44847->192.168.1.165:1234 not hit
> [ 2106.897412] IPVS: lookup service: fwm 0 TCP 192.168.1.165:1234 hit
> [ 2106.897414] IPVS: ip_vs_wlc_schedule(): Scheduling...
> [ 2106.897416] IPVS: WLC: server 195.0.0.1:1234 activeconns 0 refcnt 2 weight 1 overhead 1
> [ 2106.897418] IPVS: Enter: ip_vs_conn_new, net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c line 693
> [ 2106.897421] IPVS: Bind-dest TCP c:192.168.1.165:44847 v:192.168.1.165:1234 d:195.0.0.1:1234 fwd:L s:0 conn->flags:181 conn->refcnt:1 dest->refcnt:3
> [ 2106.897425] IPVS: Schedule fwd:L c:192.168.1.165:44847 v:192.168.1.165:1234 d:195.0.0.1:1234 conn->flags:1C1 conn->refcnt:2
> [ 2106.897429] IPVS: TCP input [S...] 195.0.0.1:1234->192.168.1.165:44847 state: NONE->SYN_RECV conn->refcnt:2
> [ 2106.897431] IPVS: Enter: ip_vs_null_xmit, net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c line 212
> [ 2106.897439] IPVS: lookup/in TCP 192.168.1.165:1234->192.168.1.165:44847 not hit
> [ 2106.897441] IPVS: lookup/out TCP 192.168.1.165:1234->192.168.1.165:44847 not hit
> [ 2107.277535] IPVS: packet type=1 proto=17 daddr=255.255.255.255 ignored
> [ 2108.542691] IPVS: packet type=1 proto=17 daddr=192.168.1.255 ignored
>
> As the result, server application does receive anything on accept(). I tried to make dummy0 a hidden device and play with arp settings. But without result.
>
> I will be happy to hear any idea how to do connection in this environment.
>
lvs seems not very SMP friendly and a bit complex.
I would use an iptables setup and a slighly modified REDIRECT target
(and/or a nf_nat_setup_info() change)
Say you have 8 daemons listening on different ports (1000 to 1007)
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 1234 -j REDIRECT --rxhash-dist --to-port 1000-1007
rxhash would be provided by RPS on recent kernels or locally computed if
not already provided by core network (or old kernel)
This rule would be triggered only at connection establishment.
conntracking take care of following packets and is SMP friendly.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-22 6:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-22 3:51 Fwd: LVS on local node Franchoze Eric
2010-07-22 6:56 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-07-22 9:10 ` Changli Gao
2010-07-22 9:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-07-22 9:52 ` Changli Gao
2010-07-22 9:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-07-22 10:06 ` Changli Gao
2010-07-23 10:54 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-07-22 12:24 ` Simon Horman
2010-07-22 12:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-07-22 13:20 ` Simon Horman
2010-07-22 18:45 ` Franchoze Eric
2010-07-22 13:25 ` Simon Horman
2010-07-22 16:59 ` Franchoze Eric
2010-09-20 5:56 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1279781811.2405.15.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=franchoze@yandex.ru \
--cc=lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wensong@linux-vs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox