From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamal Subject: Re: mirred, redirect action vs. dev refcount issue Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:02:13 -0400 Message-ID: <1279821733.3808.0.camel@bigi> References: <20100721162426.5aa4b646@nehalam> <20100721.163955.12041610.davem@davemloft.net> <20100721165247.6d1dd879@nehalam> <20100721.165802.111593910.davem@davemloft.net> <20100721170024.60cd9ef4@nehalam> <1279793481.2747.39.camel@bigi> <20100722104256.5a7e7cb6@nehalam> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Received: from mail-vw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:64540 "EHLO mail-vw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759291Ab0GVSCT (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:02:19 -0400 Received: by vws3 with SMTP id 3so423965vws.19 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:02:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100722104256.5a7e7cb6@nehalam> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 10:42 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > This is what I am testing now. > Looks very reasonable to me. Please add my signoff when you submit. cheers, jamal