From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Andrea Shepard <andrea@persephoneslair.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: pskb_expand_head() optimization
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 07:09:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1279861748.2482.13.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100722191234.GA832@cronus.persephoneslair.org>
Le jeudi 22 juillet 2010 à 12:12 -0700, Andrea Shepard a écrit :
> Make pskb_expand_head() check ip_summed to make sure csum_start is really
> csum_start and not csum before adjusting it.
>
> This fixes a bug I encountered using a Sun Quad-Fast Ethernet card and VLANs.
> On my configuration, the sunhme driver produces skbs with differing amounts
> of headroom on receive depending on the packet size. See line 2030 of
> drivers/net/sunhme.c; packets smaller than RX_COPY_THRESHOLD have 52 bytes
> of headroom but packets larger than that cutoff have only 20 bytes.
>
> When these packets reach the VLAN driver, vlan_check_reorder_header()
> calls skb_cow(), which, if the packet has less than NET_SKB_PAD (== 32) bytes
> of headroom, uses pskb_expand_head() to make more.
>
> Then, pskb_expand_head() needs to adjust a lot of offsets into the skb,
> including csum_start. Since csum_start is a union with csum, if the packet
> has a valid csum value this will corrupt it, which was the effect I observed.
> The sunhme hardware computes receive checksums, so the skbs would be created
> by the driver with ip_summed == CHECKSUM_COMPLETE and a valid csum field, and
> then pskb_expand_head() would corrupt the csum field, leading to an "hw csum
> error" message later on, for example in icmp_rcv() for pings larger than the
> sunhme RX_COPY_THRESHOLD.
>
> On the basis of the comment at the beginning of include/linux/skbuff.h,
> I believe that the csum_start skb field is only meaningful if ip_csummed is
> CSUM_PARTIAL, so this patch makes pskb_expand_head() adjust it only in that
> case to avoid corrupting a valid csum value.
>
> Please see my more in-depth disucssion of tracking down this bug for
> more details if you like:
>
> http://puellavulnerata.livejournal.com/112186.html
> http://puellavulnerata.livejournal.com/112567.html
> http://puellavulnerata.livejournal.com/112891.html
> http://puellavulnerata.livejournal.com/113096.html
> http://puellavulnerata.livejournal.com/113591.html
>
> I am not subscribed to this list, so please CC me on replies.
>
Excellent Changelog Andrea, thanks !
Reviewing pskb_expand_head(), I see it copy the whole struct
skb_shared_info, even if source contains garbage (uninitialized data).
I wonder why it is not triggering kmemcheck alarms
[PATCH net-next-2.6] net: pskb_expand_head() optimization
Move frags[] at the end of struct skb_shared_info, and make
pskb_expand_head() copy only the used part of it instead of whole array.
This should avoid kmemcheck warnings and speedup pskb_expand_head() as
well, avoiding a lot of cache misses.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/skbuff.h | 3 ++-
net/core/skbuff.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
index f5aa87e..d89876b 100644
--- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
+++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
@@ -202,10 +202,11 @@ struct skb_shared_info {
*/
atomic_t dataref;
- skb_frag_t frags[MAX_SKB_FRAGS];
/* Intermediate layers must ensure that destructor_arg
* remains valid until skb destructor */
void * destructor_arg;
+ /* must be last field, see pskb_expand_head() */
+ skb_frag_t frags[MAX_SKB_FRAGS];
};
/* We divide dataref into two halves. The higher 16 bits hold references
diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index 76d33ca..7da58a2 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -817,7 +817,7 @@ int pskb_expand_head(struct sk_buff *skb, int nhead, int ntail,
memcpy(data + nhead, skb->head, skb->tail - skb->head);
#endif
memcpy(data + size, skb_end_pointer(skb),
- sizeof(struct skb_shared_info));
+ offsetof(struct skb_shared_info, frags[skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags]));
for (i = 0; i < skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags; i++)
get_page(skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[i].page);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-23 5:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-22 19:12 [PATCH] Fix corruption of skb csum field in pskb_expand_head() of net/core/skbuff.c Andrea Shepard
2010-07-22 20:28 ` David Miller
2010-07-23 5:09 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-07-25 4:06 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: pskb_expand_head() optimization David Miller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-09-03 3:43 [PATCH] net: Frag list lost on head expansion David Miller
2010-09-03 5:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-03 9:09 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: pskb_expand_head() optimization Eric Dumazet
2010-09-03 13:46 ` David Miller
2010-09-07 2:20 ` David Miller
2010-09-07 5:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-07 5:05 ` David Miller
2010-09-07 9:16 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-07 9:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-10 19:54 ` David Miller
2010-09-11 12:31 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-12 3:30 ` David Miller
2010-09-12 10:45 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-12 10:58 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-12 15:58 ` David Miller
2010-09-12 16:13 ` David Miller
2010-09-12 20:57 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-12 22:08 ` David Miller
2010-09-13 7:49 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-12 19:55 ` Ben Pfaff
2010-09-12 20:24 ` David Miller
2010-09-12 20:45 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-20 0:17 ` David Miller
2010-09-20 7:21 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-20 9:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-20 9:14 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-20 12:12 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-20 12:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-20 16:59 ` David Miller
2010-09-07 1:25 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1279861748.2482.13.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=andrea@persephoneslair.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox