From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] drivers/net/vxge: Use pr_, fix logging macros Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:43:35 -0700 Message-ID: <1280267015.24054.42.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> References: <1280263388.24054.27.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <20100727213819.GC25556@exar.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ramkrishna Vepa , Sreenivasa Honnur , "David S. Miller" , netdev , LKML To: Jon Mason Return-path: Received: from mail.perches.com ([173.55.12.10]:2134 "EHLO mail.perches.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752715Ab0G0Vnh (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:43:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100727213819.GC25556@exar.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 16:38 -0500, Jon Mason wrote: > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 01:43:08PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > Use direct printing of logging messages to save text. > I have a similar patch queued internally (pending testing). Great. [] > Why not make the entire vxge_debug part of vxge_debug_ll? If > disabled, that code can be removed completely as it is unnecessary. > Also, why not call printk directly from vxge_debug? This code had too > many levels of indirection before, remove all of them (as that is way > I did in the internal patch). 'cause I don't really want to figure out the nesting, I just want it to be smaller and easier to understand. > I did not have any of these changes in my patch. If you want to push > this seperately, I ack it. I'll resend separately. cheers, Joe