From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Hutchings Subject: Re: [PATCH ethtool 1/2] ethtool: Use inet_aton() to parse IPv4 addresses for RX n-tuple control Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 21:51:08 +0100 Message-ID: <1280955068.2089.4.camel@achroite.uk.solarflarecom.com> References: <1279825899.2104.28.camel@achroite.uk.solarflarecom.com> <4C59CF65.2060801@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com To: Jeff Garzik Return-path: Received: from mail.solarflare.com ([216.237.3.220]:6641 "EHLO exchange.solarflare.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934580Ab0HDUvL (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Aug 2010 16:51:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4C59CF65.2060801@garzik.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 16:36 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > FYI, I'm about to roll a new ethtool release for kernel 2.6.35. Are > these two patches the only outstanding ones? (they look good, will be > applied) Yes, those are the only ones. > P.S. The maintainer address is jgarzik@pobox.com, my standard kernel > address. jgarzik@redhat.com has a much higher latency, as it doesn't > get used very much. Sorry about that. I've changed my git-format-patch config accordingly. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.