From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: MAINTAINERS: PCMCIA SUBSYSTEM: Should F: drivers/net/pcmcia/ be added? Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:47:52 -0700 Message-ID: <1281653272.15486.62.camel@Joe-Laptop> References: <20100809153410.GA27238@comet.dominikbrodowski.net> <1281651771.15486.55.camel@Joe-Laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Wolfram Sang , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org, David Miller To: Dominik Brodowski Return-path: Received: from mail.perches.com ([173.55.12.10]:1040 "EHLO mail.perches.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934096Ab0HLWry (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Aug 2010 18:47:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1281651771.15486.55.camel@Joe-Laptop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 15:22 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 17:34 +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > > look good from a PCMCIA point of view, therefore: > > Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski There's no maintainer entry for directory drivers/net/pcmcia/ Should F: drivers/net/pcmcia/ be added to the existing PCMCIA SUBSYSTEM entry?