From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: net: af_packet: skb_orphan should be avoided in TX path.
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 17:44:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1283787867.2654.600.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100906103505.GA15254@redhat.com>
Le lundi 06 septembre 2010 à 13:35 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin a écrit :
> I think there are bigger issues here. As was pointed out, drivers might
> orphan skbs before they transmit them.
> And at least for tun, the reason is that we might hang on
> to skbs indefinitely because userspace is not reading them.
>
> So in that case, if you just prevent tun from orphaning skbs, the socket
> will be prevented from sending any more packets out even if they are for
> a completely unrelated destinations, right?
> Further, module can't get unloaded and I think socket can not get
> closed, so user can't kill the task which has the socket?
>
> And thinking about this, I think I see
> another issue related to the use of the destructor callback:
>
> static void tpacket_destruct_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> struct packet_sock *po = pkt_sk(skb->sk);
> void *ph;
>
> BUG_ON(skb == NULL);
>
> if (likely(po->tx_ring.pg_vec)) {
> ph = skb_shinfo(skb)->destructor_arg;
> BUG_ON(__packet_get_status(po, ph) != TP_STATUS_SENDING);
> BUG_ON(atomic_read(&po->tx_ring.pending) == 0);
> atomic_dec(&po->tx_ring.pending);
> __packet_set_status(po, ph, TP_STATUS_AVAILABLE);
> }
>
> sock_wfree(skb);
>
> <-----
> at this point we still have to execute instructions
> in this function to return from it. However
> socket and thus module reference count
> got already dropped to 0, so I think module could get unloaded
> and these instructions could get overwritten.
>
> }
>
> I conclude that destructor callback should never point to a function residing
> in a module, always to a function that is guaranteed to be builtin, this
> function must be the one that drops the last module reference.
It would be a surprise to use tx mmap (presumably to get high
performance), and a modular af_unix ;)
>
> Comments?
The whole thing (packet / tx mmap) is broken, if you ask me.
skb_orphan() is not about protecting data, but doing per socket memory
accounting.
We have to skb_orphan() while data is still in use by skb, not only in
drivers but in core network stack. (loopback case for example, no need
to think about TUN being special ;) )
So I believe using mmap and tx on af_unix is racy in its current design.
We probably can remove some skb_orphan() calls (now its done in core
network, no real need to make it from some drivers), but not have a
complete solution to the problem Changli raised, without adding yet
another field into skb_shared_info...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-06 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-05 17:18 net: af_packet: skb_orphan should be avoided in TX path Changli Gao
2010-09-05 17:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-05 17:51 ` Changli Gao
2010-09-05 18:08 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2010-09-06 10:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-09-06 15:44 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-09-06 19:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-09-06 20:11 ` David Miller
2010-09-08 17:39 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1283787867.2654.600.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox