From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH NEXT 3/5] qlcnic: vlan lro support Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 15:27:18 +0200 Message-ID: <1284643638.3352.30.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <1284642872-27832-1-git-send-email-amit.salecha@qlogic.com> <1284642872-27832-4-git-send-email-amit.salecha@qlogic.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, ameen.rahman@qlogic.com, anirban.chakraborty@qlogic.com To: Amit Kumar Salecha Return-path: Received: from mail-ew0-f46.google.com ([209.85.215.46]:36887 "EHLO mail-ew0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751456Ab0IPN1X (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Sep 2010 09:27:23 -0400 Received: by ewy23 with SMTP id 23so528211ewy.19 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 06:27:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1284642872-27832-4-git-send-email-amit.salecha@qlogic.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le jeudi 16 septembre 2010 =C3=A0 06:14 -0700, Amit Kumar Salecha a =C3= =A9crit : > LRO + GRO + vlan rx accleration support, performance increases > around 20% and cpu utilization reduces around 70% on vlan interface. Interesting. What is the workload that demonstrates such gains ?