From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: problem with flowi structure Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 18:34:55 +0200 Message-ID: <1284741295.3391.100.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <1284650768.3352.37.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1284652453.3352.38.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1284714533.3391.53.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: AIJAZ BAIG , netfilter-devel , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Nicola Padovano Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Le vendredi 17 septembre 2010 =C3=A0 18:27 +0200, Nicola Padovano a =C3= =A9crit : > > With different keys (src addr, tos, fwmark, ...) we can have a lot = of > > different routes for apparently same destination > and why this reasoning it isn't present on the routing table? > I mean: there will be a reason for which this isn't present in the ro= uting table >=20 >=20 It is present, of course, since route cache can be flushed (or bypassed), you need to be able to rebuild it from a stable reference. ip rule ls ip ro list table xxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-dev= el" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html