Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Cc: Nick Bowler <nbowler@elliptictech.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: Regression, bisected: reference leak with IPSec since ~2.6.31
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:21:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1285060860.2617.158.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100921091248.GA8424@ff.dom.local>

Le mardi 21 septembre 2010 à 09:12 +0000, Jarek Poplawski a écrit :
> On 2010-09-20 23:31, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> ...
> > [PATCH] ip : fix truesize mismatch in ip fragmentation
> > 
> > We should not set frag->destructor to sock_wkfree() until we are sure we
> > dont hit slow path in ip_fragment(). Or we risk uncharging
> > frag->truesize twice, and in the end, having negative socket
> > sk_wmem_alloc counter, or even freeing socket sooner than expected.
> > 
> > Many thanks to Nick Bowler, who provided a very clean bug report and
> > test programs.
> > 
> > While Nick bisection pointed to commit 2b85a34e911bf483 (net: No more
> > expensive sock_hold()/sock_put() on each tx), underlying bug is older.
> > 
> > Reported-and-bisected-by: Nick Bowler <nbowler@elliptictech.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  net/ipv4/ip_output.c  |    8 ++++----
> >  net/ipv6/ip6_output.c |   10 +++++-----
> >  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
> > index 04b6989..126d9b3 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
> > @@ -490,7 +490,6 @@ int ip_fragment(struct sk_buff *skb, int (*output)(struct sk_buff *))
> >  	if (skb_has_frags(skb)) {
> >  		struct sk_buff *frag;
> >  		int first_len = skb_pagelen(skb);
> > -		int truesizes = 0;
> >  
> >  		if (first_len - hlen > mtu ||
> >  		    ((first_len - hlen) & 7) ||
> > @@ -510,11 +509,13 @@ int ip_fragment(struct sk_buff *skb, int (*output)(struct sk_buff *))
> >  				goto slow_path;
> >  
> >  			BUG_ON(frag->sk);
> > -			if (skb->sk) {
> > +		}
> > +		if (skb->sk) {
> > +			skb_walk_frags(skb, frag) {
> >  				frag->sk = skb->sk;
> >  				frag->destructor = sock_wfree;
> 
> Nice catch, but it seems doing it in the first loop as now, and
> reverting changes before goto slow_path might be more optimal here.
> 

I thought of this, but found this function already very complex.

Once everything is in cpu caches, the added loop is very cheap.

I liked the :

<check everything without changing state>
if something wrong
	goto slow_path
else
	<OK, lets do destructive things>



  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-21  9:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-20 17:44 Regression, bisected: reference leak with IPSec since ~2.6.31 Nick Bowler
2010-09-20 18:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-20 19:52   ` Nick Bowler
2010-09-20 20:00     ` David Miller
2010-09-20 21:23       ` Nick Bowler
2010-09-20 20:17     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-20 21:31       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-21  6:16         ` [PATCH] ip : take care of last fragment in ip_append_data Eric Dumazet
2010-09-21 23:38           ` David Miller
2010-09-22  4:44             ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-22  4:53               ` David Miller
2010-09-24 21:42           ` David Miller
2010-09-21  9:12         ` Regression, bisected: reference leak with IPSec since ~2.6.31 Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-21  9:21           ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-09-21  9:38             ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-21  9:55               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-21 10:07                 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-21 10:48                   ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-21 11:58                     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-21 12:39                       ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-21 14:05         ` Nick Bowler
2010-09-21 14:16           ` [PATCH] ip : fix truesize mismatch in ip fragmentation Eric Dumazet
2010-09-21 15:58             ` [PATCH v3] ip: " Eric Dumazet
2010-09-21 16:26               ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-09-21 16:31                 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-21 18:09                   ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-09-21 19:24                     ` David Miller
2010-09-21 23:06                       ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-09-21 17:50               ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-21 18:47                 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-21 19:21                   ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-21 22:15                     ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1285060860.2617.158.camel@edumazet-laptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jarkao2@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nbowler@elliptictech.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox