netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 7/8] sfc: Set net_device::num_rx_queues once we know the correct value
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 02:31:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1285106878.2697.96.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100921.145703.189694076.davem@davemloft.net>

On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 14:57 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
> Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 20:05:46 +0100
> 
> > If RPS is enabled there's a separate kobject for each RX queue.  Those
> > other drivers probably should be setting it.
> > 
> > Oh, but this only exists if CONFIG_RPS is enabled.  I think we need an
> > inline function for setting this.
> 
> It's set in the core by alloc_netdev_mq(), you should never have to
> set this in your driver.

That specifies the maximum possible number of queues, but we don't
require that the actual number of TX queues (real_num_tx_queues) is the
same as the maximum (num_tx_queues) and nor should we assume that of RX
queues.  I don't think we should require that the maximum numbers of RX
and TX queues are the same either, for that matter.

> And that also takes care of the CONFIG_RPS dependency in one spot,
> another good argument for drivers never touching this value.
> 
> I'm not applying this patch.

Right, but we do need to have some way for drivers to specify the actual
number of RX queues.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-22  1:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-20 18:40 [PATCH net-next-2.6 0/8] sfc and ethtool changes for 2.6.37 Ben Hutchings
2010-09-20 18:41 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 1/8] ethtool: Define RX n-tuple action to clear a rule Ben Hutchings
2010-09-20 18:42 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 2/8] ethtool: Add Ethernet MAC-level filtering/steering Ben Hutchings
2010-09-20 18:42 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 3/8] ethtool: Allocate register dump buffer with vmalloc() Ben Hutchings
2010-09-20 18:43 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 4/8] sfc: Add filter table management Ben Hutchings
2010-09-20 18:43 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 5/8] sfc: Implement the ethtool RX n-tuple control functions Ben Hutchings
2010-09-20 18:43 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 6/8] sfc: Include RX IP filter table in register dump Ben Hutchings
2010-09-20 18:43 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 7/8] sfc: Set net_device::num_rx_queues once we know the correct value Ben Hutchings
2010-09-20 18:54   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-20 19:05     ` Ben Hutchings
2010-09-21 21:57       ` David Miller
2010-09-22  1:31         ` Ben Hutchings [this message]
2010-09-22  1:38           ` David Miller
2010-09-22 15:28             ` Ben Hutchings
2010-09-22 15:44               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-20 18:44 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 8/8] sfc: Clean up and correct comments on efx_monitor() Ben Hutchings
2010-09-21 21:58 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 0/8] sfc and ethtool changes for 2.6.37 David Miller
2010-09-21 23:23   ` David Miller
2010-09-22 15:27     ` Ben Hutchings

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1285106878.2697.96.camel@localhost \
    --to=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).