From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Cc: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] net: af_packet: don't call tpacket_destruct_skb() until the skb is sent out
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:01:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1285311660.2380.62.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100924063623.GA6359@ff.dom.local>
Le vendredi 24 septembre 2010 à 06:36 +0000, Jarek Poplawski a écrit :
> On 2010-09-23 12:15, Changli Gao wrote:
> > Since skb->destructor() is used to account socket memory, and maybe called
> > before the skb is sent out, a corrupt skb maybe sent out finally.
> >
> > A new destructor is added into structure skb_shared_info(), and it won't
> > be called until the last reference to the data of an skb is put. af_packet
> > uses this destructor instead.
>
> IMHO, we shouldn't allow for fixing the bad design of one protocol at
> the expense of others by adding more and more conditionals. The proper
> way of handling paged skbs (splice compatible) exists. And the current
> patch doesn't even fix the problem completely against things like
> pskb_expand_head or pskb_copy.
>
> af_packet could check some flag which guarantees the queued dev can do
> skb_orphan after the real xmit and copy buffers otherwise.
Agreed.
af_packet (tx with mmap) is broken. I wonder who really uses it ?
To properly cope with paged skbs, it should not try to fit several
packets per page.
The mmap api should change so that one mmaped page belongs to at most
one skb, or else we need invasive changes in net/core
This probably makes this stuff less interesting, unless the need is to
send big packets. In this case, why splice was not used instead of
custom mmap ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-24 7:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-23 10:15 [PATCH v3] net: af_packet: don't call tpacket_destruct_skb() until the skb is sent out Changli Gao
2010-09-23 12:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-23 14:17 ` Changli Gao
2010-09-23 14:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-24 6:36 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-24 7:01 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-09-27 1:25 ` David Miller
2010-09-27 5:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-27 1:22 ` David Miller
2010-09-27 5:30 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-27 6:56 ` David Miller
2010-09-27 1:24 ` Changli Gao
2010-09-27 5:46 ` Jarek Poplawski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1285311660.2380.62.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
--cc=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox