From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: l2tpv3 support not yet in iproute2? Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 18:23:16 +0200 Message-ID: <1285604596.3017.80.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, James Chapman To: jpo234 Return-path: Received: from mail-ew0-f46.google.com ([209.85.215.46]:45540 "EHLO mail-ew0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759161Ab0I0QX0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:23:26 -0400 Received: by ewy23 with SMTP id 23so1437710ewy.19 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:23:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le lundi 27 septembre 2010 =C3=A0 15:22 +0000, jpo234 a =C3=A9crit : > Hello all, > some time ago James Chapman sent patches that add L2TPv3 support to i= proute2: > http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-netdev/2010/3/18/6272266/thre= ad > While the kernel support arrived in 2.6.35 the user space configurati= on support > still seems to be missing: > iproute2-2.6.35$ find . -type f -iname "*.c" | xargs fgrep -i l2tp > doesn't find anything. >=20 > Can somebody clarify the current situation? Hmm, this reminds me l2tp locking is buggy and not yet fixed. http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-netdev/2010/4/20/6275106 James, any chance you could fix the locking ?