From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shirley Ma Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] macvtap: TX zero copy between guest and host kernel Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 07:31:29 -0700 Message-ID: <1285770689.31343.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1284483745.13351.71.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20100914182707.GB15549@redhat.com> <1284490143.13351.82.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20100914190156.GA16037@redhat.com> <1284492983.13351.95.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20100915051241.GA25340@redhat.com> <1284531675.24603.259.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20100915101000.GB28016@redhat.com> <1284562354.2573.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1285730669.31343.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20100929081645.GA21195@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Avi Kivity , "Xin, Xiaohui" , David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100929081645.GA21195@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 10:16 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > If you look at dev_hard_start_xmit you will see a call > to skb_orphan_try which often calls the skb destructor. > So I suspect this is almost equivalent to your original patch, > and has the same correctness issue. I forgot to mention, in skb_orphan_try, I still kept the skb->sk reference to sk, I assign skb->sk to NULL when the DMA done. Thanks Shirley