From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
"Pekka Savola (ipv6)" <pekkas@netcore.fi>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: code cleanups
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 19:49:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1285814979.1866.229.camel@Joe-Laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1285813497-7384-1-git-send-email-xiaosuo@gmail.com>
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 10:24 +0800, Changli Gao wrote:
> Compare operations are more readable, and compilers generate the same code
> for the both.
As far as I know, not all supported versions of gcc
generate the same code.
Also, you could probably now remove the (__force u32) casts.
> Use the macros fl4_* to shrink the length of the lines.
>
> Signed-off-by: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>
> ---
> net/ipv4/af_inet.c | 7 +++----
> net/ipv4/route.c | 27 ++++++++++++---------------
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
> index f581f77..ef26640 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
> @@ -1338,10 +1338,9 @@ static struct sk_buff **inet_gro_receive(struct sk_buff **head,
>
> iph2 = ip_hdr(p);
>
> - if ((iph->protocol ^ iph2->protocol) |
> - (iph->tos ^ iph2->tos) |
> - ((__force u32)iph->saddr ^ (__force u32)iph2->saddr) |
> - ((__force u32)iph->daddr ^ (__force u32)iph2->daddr)) {
> + if (iph->protocol != iph2->protocol || iph->tos != iph2->tos ||
> + (__force u32)iph->saddr != (__force u32)iph2->saddr ||
> + (__force u32)iph->daddr != (__force u32)iph2->daddr) {
> NAPI_GRO_CB(p)->same_flow = 0;
> continue;
> }
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
> index 98beda4..6b00fde 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/route.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
> @@ -683,19 +683,18 @@ static inline bool rt_caching(const struct net *net)
> static inline bool compare_hash_inputs(const struct flowi *fl1,
> const struct flowi *fl2)
> {
> - return ((((__force u32)fl1->nl_u.ip4_u.daddr ^ (__force u32)fl2->nl_u.ip4_u.daddr) |
> - ((__force u32)fl1->nl_u.ip4_u.saddr ^ (__force u32)fl2->nl_u.ip4_u.saddr) |
> - (fl1->iif ^ fl2->iif)) == 0);
> + return (__force u32)fl1->fl4_dst == (__force u32)fl2->fl4_dst &&
> + (__force u32)fl1->fl4_src == (__force u32)fl2->fl4_src &&
> + fl1->iif == fl2->iif;
> }
>
> static inline int compare_keys(struct flowi *fl1, struct flowi *fl2)
> {
> - return (((__force u32)fl1->nl_u.ip4_u.daddr ^ (__force u32)fl2->nl_u.ip4_u.daddr) |
> - ((__force u32)fl1->nl_u.ip4_u.saddr ^ (__force u32)fl2->nl_u.ip4_u.saddr) |
> - (fl1->mark ^ fl2->mark) |
> - (*(u16 *)&fl1->nl_u.ip4_u.tos ^ *(u16 *)&fl2->nl_u.ip4_u.tos) |
> - (fl1->oif ^ fl2->oif) |
> - (fl1->iif ^ fl2->iif)) == 0;
> + return (__force u32)fl1->fl4_dst == (__force u32)fl2->fl4_dst &&
> + (__force u32)fl1->fl4_src == (__force u32)fl2->fl4_src &&
> + fl1->mark == fl2->mark &&
> + *(u16 *)&fl1->fl4_tos == *(u16 *)&fl2->fl4_tos &&
> + fl1->oif == fl2->oif && fl1->iif == fl2->iif;
> }
>
> static inline int compare_netns(struct rtable *rt1, struct rtable *rt2)
> @@ -2286,12 +2285,10 @@ int ip_route_input_common(struct sk_buff *skb, __be32 daddr, __be32 saddr,
>
> for (rth = rcu_dereference(rt_hash_table[hash].chain); rth;
> rth = rcu_dereference(rth->dst.rt_next)) {
> - if ((((__force u32)rth->fl.fl4_dst ^ (__force u32)daddr) |
> - ((__force u32)rth->fl.fl4_src ^ (__force u32)saddr) |
> - (rth->fl.iif ^ iif) |
> - rth->fl.oif |
> - (rth->fl.fl4_tos ^ tos)) == 0 &&
> - rth->fl.mark == skb->mark &&
> + if ((__force u32)rth->fl.fl4_dst == (__force u32)daddr &&
> + (__force u32)rth->fl.fl4_src == (__force u32)saddr &&
> + rth->fl.iif == iif && rth->fl.oif == 0 &&
> + rth->fl.fl4_tos == tos && rth->fl.mark == skb->mark &&
> net_eq(dev_net(rth->dst.dev), net) &&
> !rt_is_expired(rth)) {
> if (noref) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-30 2:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-30 2:24 [PATCH] net: code cleanups Changli Gao
2010-09-30 2:49 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2010-09-30 3:07 ` Changli Gao
2010-09-30 3:13 ` Joe Perches
2010-09-30 5:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-30 6:09 ` Changli Gao
2010-09-30 6:31 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1285814979.1866.229.camel@Joe-Laptop \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pekkas@netcore.fi \
--cc=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).