From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Alexey Vlasov <renton@renton.name>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Packet time delays on multi-core systems
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 20:03:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1285869782.2615.920.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100930173732.GB4094@beaver.vrungel.ru>
Le jeudi 30 septembre 2010 à 21:37 +0400, Alexey Vlasov a écrit :
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 02:44:29PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Le jeudi 30 septembre 2010 ?? 16:23 +0400, Alexey Vlasov a ??crit :
> > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 08:33:52AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > > Le jeudi 30 septembre 2010 ?? 10:24 +0400, Alexey Vlasov a ??crit :
> > > > > Here I found some dude with the same problem:
> > > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/9/340
> > >
> > > Well I put interrups from NIC, namely tx/rx query, to different
> > > processors and got normal pings by adding LOG rule.
> > >
> > > I also found that overruns is constantly growing, I don't know if these are connected.
> > > RX packets:2831439546 errors:0 dropped:134726 overruns:947671733 frame:0
> > > TX packets:2880849825 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> > >
>
> Too early to be happy, concerning one rule- the situation got better, but still
> there are some time delays. But adding one more rule:
> -A INPUT -p all -m state --state INVALID -j LOG --log-prefix
> "ipsec:IN-INVALID "
> it got totally wrecked:
> ...
> 64 bytes from (10.0.2.17): icmp_seq=24 ttl=64 time=0.342 ms
> 64 bytes from (10.0.2.17): icmp_seq=25 ttl=64 time=1868 ms
> 64 bytes from (10.0.2.17): icmp_seq=26 ttl=64 time=1448 ms
> 64 bytes from (10.0.2.17): icmp_seq=27 ttl=64 time=447 ms
> 64 bytes from (10.0.2.17): icmp_seq=28 ttl=64 time=0.196 ms
> ...
> 100 packets transmitted, 100 received, 0% packet loss, time 99990ms
> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.108/39.068/1868.663/237.507 ms, pipe 2
>
> # iptables -L -v -n
> Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 601K packets, 475M bytes)
> pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
> 275 11096 LOG all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state INVALID LOG flags 0 level 4 prefix `ipsec:IN-INVALID '
>
> Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
> pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
>
> Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 529K packets, 561M bytes)
> pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
> 13979 839K LOG tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:80 flags:0x17/0x02 LOG flags 8 level 4 prefix `ipsec:SYN-OUTPUT-DROP '
>
> > > Here goes the typical distribution of interrups on new servers:
> > > CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3 ... CPU23
> > > 752: 11 0 0 0 ... 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth0
> > > 753: 2799366721 0 0 0 ... 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth0-rx3
> > > 754: 2821840553 0 0 0 ... 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth0-rx2
> > > 755: 2786117044 0 0 0 ... 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth0-rx1
> > > 756: 2896099336 0 0 0 ... 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth0-rx0
> > > 757: 1808404680 0 0 0 ... 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth0-tx3
> > > 758: 1797855130 0 0 0 ... 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth0-tx2
> > > 759: 1807222032 0 0 0 ... 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth0-tx1
> > > 760: 1820309360 0 0 0 ... 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth0-tx0
> > >
> >
> > echo 01 >/proc/irq/*/eth0-rx0/../smp_affinity
> > echo 02 >/proc/irq/*/eth0-rx1/../smp_affinity
> > echo 04 >/proc/irq/*/eth0-rx2/../smp_affinity
> > echo 08 >/proc/irq/*/eth0-rx3/../smp_affinity
> >
> >
> > cat /proc/irq/*/eth0-rx0/../smp_affinity
> > cat /proc/irq/*/eth0-rx1/../smp_affinity
> > cat /proc/irq/*/eth0-rx2/../smp_affinity
> > cat /proc/irq/*/eth0-rx3/../smp_affinity
>
> The last test were made already concerning such rx queue binding:
> # cat /proc/irq/60/smp_affinity
> 001000
> # cat /proc/irq/61/smp_affinity
> 010000
> # cat /proc/irq/62/smp_affinity
> 080000
> # cat /proc/irq/63/smp_affinity
> 800000
>
Why 60, 61, 62, 63 ? This should be 753, 754, 755, 756
> Now ksoftirqd eats not only one processor but all oness where I assigned the IRQs.
>
> > > On the old ones:
> > > CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 ... CPU8
> > > 502: 522320256 522384039 522327386 ... 522380267 PCI-MSI-edge eth0
> > >
> >
> > What network driver is it (newbox), was it (old box) ?
>
> newbox:
> 01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82575EB Gigabit Network
> Connection (rev 02)
> driver: igb
> version: 1.3.16-k2
> firmware-version: 2.1-0
> bus-info: 0000:01:00.0
>
> oldbox:
> 05:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 80003ES2LAN Gigabit
> Ethernet Controller (Copper) (rev 01)
> driver: e1000e
> version: 0.3.3.3-k6
> firmware-version: 1.0-0
> bus-info: 0000:05:00.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-30 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20100929191851.GC86786@beaver.vrungel.ru>
2010-09-29 21:45 ` Packet time delays on multi-core systems Eric Dumazet
2010-09-30 6:24 ` Alexey Vlasov
2010-09-30 6:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-30 12:23 ` Alexey Vlasov
2010-09-30 12:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-30 17:37 ` Alexey Vlasov
2010-09-30 18:03 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-09-30 18:15 ` Alexey Vlasov
2010-09-30 18:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-01 10:16 ` Alexey Vlasov
2010-10-01 12:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-01 14:18 ` Alexey Vlasov
2010-10-01 15:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-01 18:54 ` Jeff Kirsher
2010-09-30 12:30 ` Alexey Vlasov
2010-09-30 12:46 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1285869782.2615.920.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=renton@renton.name \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox