Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>
Cc: bhutchings@solarflare.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, therbert@google.com
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH] net: netif_set_real_num_rx_queues may cap num_rx_queues at init time
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 07:35:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1286256926.2457.2.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101004220042.3471.92774.stgit@jf-dev1-dcblab>

Le lundi 04 octobre 2010 à 15:00 -0700, John Fastabend a écrit :
> The logic for netif_set_real_num_rx_queues is the following,
> 
> netif_set_real_num_rx_queues(dev, rxq)
> {
> 	...
> 	if (dev->reg_state == NETREG_REGISTERED) {
> 		...
> 	} else {
> 		dev->num_rx_queues = rxq;
> 	}
> 
> 	dev->real_num_rx_queues = rxq;
> 	return 0;
> }
> 
> Some drivers init path looks like the following,
> 
> alloc_etherdev_mq(priv_sz, max_num_queues_ever);
> ...
> netif_set_real_num_rx_queues(dev, queues_to_use_now);
> ...
> register_netdev(dev);
> ...
> 
> Because netif_set_real_num_rx_queues sets num_rx_queues if the
> reg state is not NETREG_REGISTERED we end up with the incorrect
> max number of rx queues. This patch proposes to remove the else
> clause above so this does not occur.  Also just reading the
> function set_real_num it seems a bit unexpected that num_rx_queues
> gets set.
> 

You dont tell why its "incorrect".

Why should we keep num_rx_queues > real_num_rx_queues ?

It creates /sys files, and Qdisc stuff for nothing...



> CC: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>
> ---
> 
>  net/core/dev.c |    2 --
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index a313bab..f78d996 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -1592,8 +1592,6 @@ int netif_set_real_num_rx_queues(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int rxq)
>  						  rxq);
>  		if (rc)
>  			return rc;
> -	} else {
> -		dev->num_rx_queues = rxq;
>  	}
>  
>  	dev->real_num_rx_queues = rxq;
> 
> --



  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-05  5:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-04 22:00 [net-next-2.6 PATCH] net: netif_set_real_num_rx_queues may cap num_rx_queues at init time John Fastabend
2010-10-05  5:35 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-10-05 16:08   ` John Fastabend
2010-10-05 16:34     ` Ben Hutchings
2010-10-05 17:45       ` John Fastabend
2010-10-06 14:52         ` John Fastabend
2010-10-06 15:07           ` Ben Hutchings
2010-10-06 15:20             ` John Fastabend
2010-10-06 15:23             ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-06 15:31               ` Ben Hutchings
2010-10-06 18:14                 ` Matt Carlson
2010-10-06 18:49                   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-06 20:41                     ` David Miller
2010-10-06 15:20           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-07  6:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-07  6:35   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1286256926.2457.2.camel@edumazet-laptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=john.r.fastabend@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=therbert@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox