From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: "Américo Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
"Pekka Savola (ipv6)" <pekkas@netcore.fi>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
ebiederm@xmission.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysctl: fix min/max handling in __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax()
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 11:51:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1286445081.2912.15.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101007092538.GE5471@cr0.nay.redhat.com>
Le jeudi 07 octobre 2010 à 17:25 +0800, Américo Wang a écrit :
> >>
> >
> >Here is the final one.
>
> Oops, that one is not correct. Hopefully this one
> is correct.
>
> --------------->
>
> Eric D. noticed that we may trigger an OOPS if we leave ->extra{1,2}
> to NULL when we use proc_doulongvec_minmax().
>
> Actually, we don't need to store min/max values in a vector,
> because all the elements in the vector should share the same min/max
> value, like what proc_dointvec_minmax() does.
>
If we assert same min/max limits are to be applied to all elements,
a much simpler fix than yours would be :
diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
index f88552c..8e45451 100644
--- a/kernel/sysctl.c
+++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
@@ -2485,7 +2485,7 @@ static int __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax(void *data, struct ctl_table *table, int
kbuf[left] = 0;
}
- for (; left && vleft--; i++, min++, max++, first=0) {
+ for (; left && vleft--; i++, first=0) {
unsigned long val;
if (write) {
Please dont send huge patches like this to 'fix' a bug,
especially on slow path.
First we fix the bug, _then_ we can try to make code more
efficient or more pretty or shorter.
So the _real_ question is :
Should the min/max limits should be a single pair,
shared by all elements, or a vector of limits.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-07 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-02 13:17 [PATCH] sysctl: fix min/max handling in __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax() Eric Dumazet
2010-10-04 3:09 ` Américo Wang
2010-10-04 8:59 ` Robin Holt
2010-10-04 9:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-04 9:34 ` Américo Wang
2010-10-04 10:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-04 10:35 ` Américo Wang
2010-10-04 10:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-05 13:01 ` Américo Wang
2010-10-07 7:18 ` Américo Wang
2010-10-07 9:25 ` Américo Wang
2010-10-07 9:51 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-10-07 16:37 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-10-07 16:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-07 19:18 ` Andrew Morton
2010-10-07 19:38 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-10-08 16:22 ` Américo Wang
2010-10-08 16:13 ` Américo Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1286445081.2912.15.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=holt@sgi.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pekkas@netcore.fi \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox