From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Kees Cook <kees.cook@canonical.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: clear heap allocations for privileged ethtool actions
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 23:31:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1286487085.3745.99.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101007211004.GA20267@outflux.net>
Le jeudi 07 octobre 2010 à 14:10 -0700, Kees Cook a écrit :
> Several other ethtool functions leave heap uncleared (potentially) by
> drivers. Some interfaces appear safe (eeprom, etc), in that the sizes
> are well controlled. In some situations (e.g. unchecked error conditions),
> the heap will remain unchanged in areas before copying back to userspace.
> Note that these are less of an issue since these all require CAP_NET_ADMIN.
> @@ -775,7 +775,7 @@ static int ethtool_get_regs(struct net_device *dev, char __user *useraddr)
> if (regs.len > reglen)
> regs.len = reglen;
>
> - regbuf = kmalloc(reglen, GFP_USER);
> + regbuf = kzalloc(reglen, GFP_USER);
> if (!regbuf)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> --
> 1.7.1
>
Are you sure this is not hiding a more problematic problem ?
Code does :
reglen = ops->get_regs_len(dev);
if (regs.len > reglen)
regs.len = reglen;
regbuf = kmalloc(reglen, GFP_USER);
So we can not copy back kernel memory.
However, what happens if user provides regs.len = 1 byte, and driver
get_regs() doesnt properly checks regs.len and write past end of regbuf
-> We probably write on other parts of kernel memory
An audit is needed, but first driver I checked is buggy
(drivers/net/qlcnic/qlcnic_ethtool.c)
->
memset(p, 0, qlcnic_get_regs_len(dev));
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-07 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-07 21:10 [PATCH] net: clear heap allocations for privileged ethtool actions Kees Cook
2010-10-07 21:31 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-10-07 21:40 ` Ben Hutchings
2010-10-07 21:40 ` Kees Cook
2010-10-07 21:34 ` Ben Hutchings
2010-10-11 19:24 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1286487085.3745.99.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=jgarzik@redhat.com \
--cc=kees.cook@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox