From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.36-rc7 Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 10:05:56 -0500 Message-ID: <1286550357.2985.90.camel@mulgrave.site> References: <20101007114938.ad3d2c76.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Russell King , David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, "John W. Linville" , Michal Marek , Dmitry Torokhov To: Stephen Rothwell Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20101007114938.ad3d2c76.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 11:49 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Linus, > > On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 14:45:13 -0700 Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > This should be the last -rc, I'm not seeing any reason to keep > > delaying a real release. There was still more changes to > > drivers/gpu/drm than I really would have hoped for, but they all look > > harmless and good. Famous last words. > > I have no idea how critical any of this stuff is, but linux-next contain > the following in it's "current" trees i.e. stuff that is supposed to go > into 2.6.36. These are from the arm-current, scsi-rc-fixes, net-current, > wireless-current, kbuild-current, input-current and ide-curent trees > (contacts cc'd). The SCSI rc-fixes stuff is critical if you run into the bugs, but the bugs are fairly rare cases for most people. I'd still like to get them in, though (and I have another 3 rc fixes candidates going through the test pipeline). James