public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: nhorman@tuxdriver.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, jpirko@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Enhance AF_PACKET implementation to not require high order contiguous memory allocation
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 22:38:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1288039106.3296.4.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1288033566-2091-1-git-send-email-nhorman@tuxdriver.com>

Le lundi 25 octobre 2010 à 15:06 -0400, nhorman@tuxdriver.com a écrit :
> From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
> 
> It was shown to me recently that systems under high load were driven very deep
> into swap when tcpdump was run.  The reason this happened was because the
> AF_PACKET protocol has a SET_RINGBUFFER socket option that allows the user space
> application to specify how many entries an AF_PACKET socket will have and how
> large each entry will be.  It seems the default setting for tcpdump is to set
> the ring buffer to 32 entries of 64 Kb each, which implies 32 order 5
> allocation.  Thats difficult under good circumstances, and horrid under memory
> pressure.
> 
> I thought it would be good to make that a bit more usable.  I was going to do a
> simple conversion of the ring buffer from contigous pages to iovecs, but
> unfortunately, the metadata which AF_PACKET places in these buffers can easily
> span a page boundary, and given that these buffers get mapped into user space,
> and the data layout doesn't easily allow for a change to padding between frames
> to avoid that, a simple iovec change is just going to break user space ABI
> consistency.
> 
> So instead I've done this.  This patch does the aforementioned change,
> allocating an array of pages instead of one contiguous chunk, and then vmaps the
> array into a contiguous memory space, so that it can still be accessed in the
> same way it was before.  This allows for a consisten user and kernel space
> behavior for memory mapped AF_PACKET sockets, which at the same time relieving
> the memory pressure placed on a system when tcpdump defaults are used.
> 
> Tested successfully by me.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
> ---

Strange because last time I took a look at this stuff, libpcap was doing
several tries, reducing page orders until it got no allocation
failures...

(It tries to get high order pages, maybe to reduce TLB pressure...)

I remember adding __GFP_NOWARN to avoid a kernel message, while tcpdump
was actually working...




  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-10-25 20:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-25 19:06 [PATCH] Enhance AF_PACKET implementation to not require high order contiguous memory allocation nhorman
2010-10-25 20:17 ` Francois Romieu
2010-10-25 20:38 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-11-09 17:46 ` [PATCH] Enhance AF_PACKET implementation to not require high order contiguous memory allocation (v2) nhorman
2010-11-09 18:02   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-09 18:38     ` Neil Horman
2010-11-09 19:20       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-09 20:57         ` Neil Horman
2010-11-09 21:07   ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2010-11-09 21:20     ` Neil Horman
2010-11-10 18:20 ` [PATCH] Enhance AF_PACKET implementation to not require high order contiguous memory allocation (v3) nhorman
2010-11-10 18:27   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-10 19:09 ` [PATCH] Enhance AF_PACKET implementation to not require high order contiguous memory allocation (v4) nhorman
2010-11-11  6:29   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-11  8:03   ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2010-11-16 18:25   ` David Miller
2010-11-16 21:30     ` Neil Horman
     [not found] <E1PAVIx-0001qL-EB@smtp.tuxdriver.com>
2010-10-25 22:30 ` [PATCH] Enhance AF_PACKET implementation to not require high order contiguous memory allocation Eric Dumazet
2010-10-25 23:35   ` Neil Horman
2010-10-25 23:46     ` David Miller
2010-10-26  0:48       ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2010-10-26  1:53         ` Neil Horman
2010-10-26  1:58       ` Neil Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1288039106.3296.4.camel@edumazet-laptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jpirko@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox