From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Joe Buehler <aspam@cox.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel panic in fib_rules_lookup [2.6.27.7 vendor-patched]
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:33:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1288103614.2622.0.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CC6DD69.4020502@cox.net>
Le mardi 26 octobre 2010 à 09:53 -0400, Joe Buehler a écrit :
> Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> > Well, it would be surprising this being wrong and crash only once in a
> > while in fib_rules_lookup
>
> > Did you tried my last patch ?
>
> There was a patch to the kernel by David Daney back in January to
> improve performance of Octeon memory barriers. The patch changes the
> generic MIPS barrier code to introduce optimizations for Octeon. The
> LINUX version I am using is from the Octeon SDK and appears to have an
> early version of this patch. It's broken however -- the Jan patch has
> proper SYNCW instructions in smp_wmb while the SDK version does not.
>
> I have made your changes but will also fold in this change, then start
> some load testing.
>
> The real-time scheduler is broken in the LINUX I am using -- I get
> kernel crashes -- and I would be most happy if the SYNCW fix fixed that
> also.
>
>
Just to make sure, are you using a single syncw, or a double one ?
/*
* We actually use two syncw instructions in a row when we need a write
* memory barrier. This is because the CN3XXX series of Octeons have
* errata Core-401. This can cause a single syncw to not enforce
* ordering under very rare conditions. Even if it is rare, better safe
* than sorry.
*/
#define CVMX_SYNCW asm volatile ("syncw\n\tsyncw" : : : "memory")
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-26 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-12 17:14 kernel panic in fib_rules_lookup [2.6.27.7 vendor-patched] Joe Buehler
2010-10-12 17:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-13 11:18 ` Joe Buehler
2010-10-20 17:43 ` Joe Buehler
2010-10-20 22:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-22 20:30 ` Joe Buehler
2010-10-23 3:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-23 15:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-23 15:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-23 15:40 ` Joe Buehler
2010-10-23 16:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-23 15:33 ` Joe Buehler
2010-10-23 16:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-23 17:37 ` "Oleg A. Arkhangelsky"
2010-10-23 19:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-26 18:43 ` David Miller
2010-10-26 13:29 ` Joe Buehler
2010-10-26 13:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-26 13:53 ` Joe Buehler
2010-10-26 13:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-26 14:33 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-10-26 14:41 ` Joe Buehler
2010-10-27 21:01 ` Joe Buehler
2010-10-27 21:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-02 13:36 ` Joe Buehler
2010-12-02 14:04 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1288103614.2622.0.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=aspam@cox.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).