From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv4: Flush per-ns routing cache more sanely. Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 20:57:05 +0200 Message-ID: <1288119425.2652.6.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <20101026.103428.179941457.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@free.fr, ebiederm@xmission.com To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-ew0-f46.google.com ([209.85.215.46]:39342 "EHLO mail-ew0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756751Ab0JZS5K (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:57:10 -0400 Received: by ewy7 with SMTP id 7so5701546ewy.19 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:57:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20101026.103428.179941457.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le mardi 26 octobre 2010 =C3=A0 10:34 -0700, David Miller a =C3=A9crit = : > Flush the routing cache only of entries that match the > network namespace in which the purge event occurred. >=20 > Signed-off-by: David S. Miller > --- >=20 > Could I get some testing and performance analysis feedback > on this change? I don't want it to just die :-) >=20 I believe its fine, thanks ! Acked-by: Eric Dumazet I'll respin my __rcu patch, of course.