From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: GSO and IPv4 forwarding Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:43:28 +0200 Message-ID: <1288125808.2652.46.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <1288124114.2652.25.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Kevin Wilson Return-path: Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:63798 "EHLO mail-ww0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757441Ab0JZUnh (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:43:37 -0400 Received: by wwe15 with SMTP id 15so5173163wwe.1 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:43:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le mardi 26 octobre 2010 =C3=A0 22:26 +0200, Kevin Wilson a =C3=A9crit = : > Hi, > Thanks a lot for your quick answer, I appreciate it (and did not > expect it to be so quick!) >=20 > Can someone please explain in 2-3 short sentences Why GRO can be > forwarded and LRO cannot be forwarded ? Well, GRO is a pure software thing, completely handled in linux stack, not driver specific. Its design included forwarding ability, LRO did not. http://lwn.net/Articles/311357/