From: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
bhutchings@solarflare.com, somnath.kotur@emulex.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 1/2] be2net: Adding an option to use INTx instead of MSI-X
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 23:45:57 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1288788357.989.77.camel@concordia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101030232155.GA14129@parisc-linux.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1127 bytes --]
On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 17:21 -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 05:52:08PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > That horse has really really bolted, it's gawn.
> >
> > I count 26 drivers with "disable MSI/X" parameters. Some even have more
> > than one.
>
> That's 26 patches someone needs to write, then. You can put my Acked-by
> on all of them.
Bah, come on it's hardly the most horrendous sin committed by driver
writers. And removing them risks breaking someone's system, even if they
are clueless, should RTFM etc.
> > I agree it's a mess for users, but it's probably preferable to a
> > non-working driver.
>
> What more drivers need is an automatic detection of a non-working
> interrupt situation, great big warning messages, and fallback to an
> alternate interrupt mechanism. Doing it for one driver, then generalising
> as much of it into the core as possible would be nice.
More detection would be good.
I don't see much potential for generalising it though. Looking at e1000e
and tg3 there is really not much in common except the very basic idea.
cheers
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-03 12:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-25 11:12 [PATCH net-next-2.6 1/2] be2net: Adding an option to use INTx instead of MSI-X Somnath Kotur
2010-10-25 19:09 ` David Miller
2010-10-25 22:38 ` Ben Hutchings
2010-10-25 23:25 ` David Miller
2010-10-26 5:24 ` Somnath.Kotur
2010-10-26 6:52 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-10-26 13:32 ` Ben Hutchings
2010-10-26 23:20 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-10-27 15:46 ` David Miller
2010-10-28 5:37 ` Grant Grundler
2010-10-27 15:45 ` David Miller
2010-10-30 23:21 ` Matthew Wilcox
2010-11-03 12:45 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2010-11-03 15:28 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1288788357.989.77.camel@concordia \
--to=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=somnath.kotur@emulex.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox