From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Rosenberg Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Fix leaking of kernel heap addresses in net/ Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 08:13:19 -0500 Message-ID: <1289221999.10229.28.camel@dan> References: <1289147492.3090.137.camel@Dan> <201011081004.48382.remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "chas@cmf.nrl.navy.mil" , "davem@davemloft.net" , "kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru" , "pekkas@netcore.fi" , "jmorris@namei.org" , "yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org" , "kaber@trash.net" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "security@kernel.org" , "stable@kernel.org" To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi?= Denis-Courmont Return-path: Received: from mx1.vsecurity.com ([209.67.252.12]:49347 "EHLO mx1.vsecurity.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753654Ab0KHNPn (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Nov 2010 08:15:43 -0500 In-Reply-To: <201011081004.48382.remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > Seems like this patch series is incomplete to me as far as /proc/net is > concerned. > I'm aware that I missed SCTP, which I will fix in the next attempt. Other than that (and sticking only to /proc leaks, since I realize there are many printk examples), care to share what was missed? -Dan