From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] macvlan: lockless tx path
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 19:18:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1289413120.2469.12.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CDADC17.6070506@candelatech.com>
Le mercredi 10 novembre 2010 à 09:53 -0800, Ben Greear a écrit :
> I agree, but if these can be read from user-space, it can be tricky to make
> solid code to deal with wraps when the thing wrapping can be 32 or 64 bits,
> depending on whether the kernel is compiled 32-bit or 64-bit.
>
> So, my preference is to use u32 or u64 so there is no guesswork involved.
>
> To be sure, this problem exists in lots of places already (/proc/net/dev comes to mind),
> but the fewer places the better in my opinion.
>
On a 32bit kernel, very few devices provide 64bit counters, so an
application reading /proc/net/dev should be prepared to handle 32 or
64bit counter.
On a 64bit kernel, many devices still provide 32, 36, 40 bit counters
(hardware based). Same conclusion for userspace.
So really, an SNMP application must be able to cope with any counter
width.
As percpu data is going to hurt in the 4096 cpu cases, we should try to
not make percpu structures too big.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-10 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-10 15:41 [PATCH] macvlan: lockless tx path Eric Dumazet
2010-11-10 17:39 ` Ben Greear
2010-11-10 17:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-10 17:53 ` Ben Greear
2010-11-10 18:18 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-11-10 18:40 ` Ben Greear
2010-11-10 20:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-10 21:04 ` Ben Hutchings
2010-11-10 21:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-10 21:53 ` Ben Hutchings
2010-11-10 21:35 ` Ben Greear
2010-11-10 22:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-10 22:53 ` Ben Greear
2010-11-10 23:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-10 23:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-10 23:46 ` Ben Greear
2010-11-11 7:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-11 16:40 ` Ben Greear
2010-11-11 16:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-11 17:20 ` Ben Greear
2010-11-11 18:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-11 18:13 ` Ben Greear
2010-11-11 18:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-11 7:14 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 v2] " Eric Dumazet
2010-11-12 8:20 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-11-16 18:59 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1289413120.2469.12.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox