From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, therbert@google.com
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH] net: zero kobject in rx_queue_release
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 08:38:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1289893125.3364.234.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101116065906.31611.36938.stgit@jf-dev1-dcblab>
Le lundi 15 novembre 2010 à 22:59 -0800, John Fastabend a écrit :
> netif_set_real_num_rx_queues() can decrement and increment
> the number of rx queues. For example ixgbe does this as
> features and offloads are toggled. Presumably this could
> also happen across down/up on most devices if the available
> resources changed (cpu offlined).
>
> The kobject needs to be zero'd in this case so that the
> state is not preserved across kobject_put()/kobject_init_and_add().
>
> This resolves the following error report.
>
> ixgbe 0000:03:00.0: eth2: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX
> kobject (ffff880324b83210): tried to init an initialized object, something is seriously wrong.
> Pid: 1972, comm: lldpad Not tainted 2.6.37-rc18021qaz+ #169
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff8121c940>] kobject_init+0x3a/0x83
> [<ffffffff8121cf77>] kobject_init_and_add+0x23/0x57
> [<ffffffff8107b800>] ? mark_lock+0x21/0x267
> [<ffffffff813c6d11>] net_rx_queue_update_kobjects+0x63/0xc6
> [<ffffffff813b5e0e>] netif_set_real_num_rx_queues+0x5f/0x78
> [<ffffffffa0261d49>] ixgbe_set_num_queues+0x1c6/0x1ca [ixgbe]
> [<ffffffffa0262509>] ixgbe_init_interrupt_scheme+0x1e/0x79c [ixgbe]
> [<ffffffffa0274596>] ixgbe_dcbnl_set_state+0x167/0x189 [ixgbe]
>
> Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>
> ---
>
> net/core/net-sysfs.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/net-sysfs.c b/net/core/net-sysfs.c
> index 3ba526b..960c075 100644
> --- a/net/core/net-sysfs.c
> +++ b/net/core/net-sysfs.c
> @@ -711,13 +711,18 @@ static void rx_queue_release(struct kobject *kobj)
>
>
> map = rcu_dereference_raw(queue->rps_map);
> - if (map)
> + if (map) {
> + rcu_assign_pointer(queue->rps_map, NULL);
Hmm, yes this works, but I am not sure queue->rps_map can be read by
other cpus at this point.
rcu_assign_pointer() is a documented interface with implied semantic : I
put a NULL pointer on a RCU protected variable, and avoid a memory
barrier because NULL is special.
If this patch is for current kernel, I advise using RCU_INIT_POINTER()
instead to make clear we only want to set the pointer to NULL, and avoid
sparse warnings :)
> call_rcu(&map->rcu, rps_map_release);
> + }
>
> flow_table = rcu_dereference_raw(queue->rps_flow_table);
> - if (flow_table)
> + if (flow_table) {
> + rcu_assign_pointer(queue->rps_flow_table, NULL);
same here ?
> call_rcu(&flow_table->rcu, rps_dev_flow_table_release);
> + }
>
> + memset(kobj, 0, sizeof(*kobj));
Is it the regular way to perform this, no kobject_{clear|del|deinit}() ?
> dev_put(queue->dev);
> }
>
>
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-16 7:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-16 6:59 [net-next-2.6 PATCH] net: zero kobject in rx_queue_release John Fastabend
2010-11-16 7:38 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-11-16 8:12 ` John Fastabend
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1289893125.3364.234.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=john.r.fastabend@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox