Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] net: implement mechanism for HW based QOS

John Fastabend
2010-11-18T17:27:59Z

On 11/16/2010 10:56 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le mardi 16 novembre 2010 à 21:15 -0800, John Fastabend a écrit :
>> This patch provides a mechanism for lower layer devices to
>> steer traffic using skb->priority to tx queues. This allows
>> for hardware based QOS schemes to use the default qdisc without
>> incurring the penalties related to global state and the qdisc
>> lock. While reliably receiving skbs on the correct tx ring
>> to avoid head of line blocking resulting from shuffling in
>> the LLD. Finally, all the goodness from txq caching and xps/rps
>> can still be leveraged.
>>
>> Many drivers and hardware exist with the ability to implement
>> QOS schemes in the hardware but currently these drivers tend
>> to rely on firmware to reroute specific traffic, a driver
>> specific select_queue or the queue_mapping action in the
>> qdisc.
>>
>> None of these solutions are ideal or generic so we end up
>> with driver specific solutions that one-off traffic types
>> for example FCoE traffic is steered in ixgbe with the
>> queue_select routine. By using select_queue for this drivers
>> need to be updated for each and every traffic type and we
>> loose the goodness of much of the upstream work. For example
>> txq caching.
>>
>> Firmware solutions are inherently inflexible. And finally if
>> admins are expected to build a qdisc and filter rules to steer
>> traffic this requires knowledge of how the hardware is currently
>> configured. The number of tx queues and the queue offsets may
>> change depending on resources. Also this approach incurs all the
>> overhead of a qdisc with filters.
>>
>> With this mechanism users can set skb priority using expected
>> methods either socket options or the stack can set this directly.
>> Then the skb will be steered to the correct tx queues aligned
>> with hardware QOS traffic classes. In the normal case with a
>> single traffic class and all queues in this class every thing
>> works as is until the LLD enables multiple tcs.
>>
>> To steer the skb we mask out the lower 8 bits of the priority
>> and allow the hardware to configure upto 15 distinct classes
>> of traffic. This is expected to be sufficient for most applications
>> at any rate it is more then the 8021Q spec designates and is
>> equal to the number of prio bands currently implemented in
>> the default qdisc.
>>
>> This in conjunction with a userspace application such as
>> lldpad can be used to implement 8021Q transmission selection
>> algorithms one of these algorithms being the extended transmission
>> selection algorithm currently being used for DCB.
>>
>> If this approach seems reasonable I'll go ahead and finish
>> this up. The priority to tc mapping should probably be exposed
>> to userspace either through sysfs or rtnetlink. Any thoughts?
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>
>> ---
>>
>> include/linux/netdevice.h | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> net/core/dev.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 2 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
>> index b45c1b8..8a2adeb 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
>> @@ -1092,6 +1092,12 @@ struct net_device {
>> /* Data Center Bridging netlink ops */
>> const struct dcbnl_rtnl_ops *dcbnl_ops;
>> #endif
>> + u8 max_tcs;
>> + u8 num_tcs;
>> + unsigned int *_tc_txqcount;
>> + unsigned int *_tc_txqoffset;
>
> This seems wrong to use two different pointers, this is a waste of cache
> memory. Also, I am not sure we need 32 bits, I believe we have a 16bit
> limit for queue numbers.
>

Thanks for the feedback!

num_tx_queues is an unsigned int in net_device and I can't see any place that would limit it to 16bits. So I think we need 32 bits here. Otherwise I will make these changes and fix the fallout. This is much cleaner.

> Use a struct {
> u16 count;
> u16 offset;
> };
>
>> + u64 prio_tc_map;
>
> Seems wrong too on 32bit arches
>
> Please use : (even if using 16 bytes instead of 8)
>
> u8 prio_tc_map[16];
>
>> +
>>
>> #if defined(CONFIG_FCOE) || defined(CONFIG_FCOE_MODULE)
>> /* max exchange id for FCoE LRO by ddp */
>> @@ -1108,6 +1114,44 @@ struct net_device {
>> #define NETDEV_ALIGN 32
>>
>> static inline
>> +int netdev_get_prio_tc_map(const struct net_device *dev, u32 prio)
>> +{
>> + return (dev->prio_tc_map >> (4 * (prio & 0xF))) & 0xF;
>
> return dev->prio_tc_map[prio & 15];
>
>> +}