From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next] bnx2x: Resolving a possible dead-lock situation Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 17:55:42 +0100 Message-ID: <1290531342.3046.115.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <1290528912.15453.3.camel@lb-tlvb-vladz> <1290529777.3046.99.camel@edumazet-laptop> <8628FE4E7912BF47A96AE7DD7BAC0AADDDEF920549@SJEXCHCCR02.corp.ad.broadcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Dave Miller , Eilon Greenstein , netdev list To: Vladislav Zolotarov Return-path: Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:61254 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753774Ab0KWQzs (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:55:48 -0500 Received: by wyb28 with SMTP id 28so8471110wyb.19 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 08:55:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8628FE4E7912BF47A96AE7DD7BAC0AADDDEF920549@SJEXCHCCR02.corp.ad.broadcom.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le mardi 23 novembre 2010 =C3=A0 08:36 -0800, Vladislav Zolotarov a =C3= =A9crit : > >=20 > > That seems strange. Even if performance penalty is not minimal, it > > should be avoided. > >=20 > > If problem comes from ethtool, why not preventing BH in ethtool its= elf > > ? >=20 > Looks good. Let me run a few checks before u submit a patch to Dave. = Or do u prefer=20 > me to push it on your behalf? I was only suggesting an alternate patch, I am not able to test it ;)