From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Hutchings Subject: Re: [PATCH] econet: Move to staging; remove from defconfig Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 02:02:23 +0000 Message-ID: <1290909743.3292.248.camel@localhost> References: <1290897868.3292.59.camel@localhost> <20101128002135.GA4562@suse.de> <20101127.172644.226781076.davem@davemloft.net> <20101128013923.GA9285@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-rm3kQDFrm96O3raYYbym" Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org To: Greg KH Return-path: Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:59766 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751149Ab0K1CC1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Nov 2010 21:02:27 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20101128013923.GA9285@suse.de> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-rm3kQDFrm96O3raYYbym Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 17:39 -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 05:26:44PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > > From: Greg KH > > Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 16:21:35 -0800 > >=20 > > > And I need an ack from the networking maintainer to be able to accept > > > this also. > >=20 > > I'm not applying this, nor do I want anyone else to. > >=20 > > If people think this protocol is not maintained adequately > > right now, wait until you push it into staging. > >=20 > > Furthermore, once Phil Blundell was made aware of security > > holes in econet he fixed them within a few days. Which is > > much better than I can say for some of the other protocols > > and filesystems in the tree. > >=20 > > Moving this into staging, is therefore not appropriate. >=20 > Agreed. >=20 > Ben, why are you trying to remove these protocols that people use and > maintain? This is the third one that has been shot down recently... Moving to staging is a step toward removal, but not removal itself. I already stated the reasons I picked those three protocols; I'm not going to push the issue if David disagrees. Ben. --=20 Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. --=-rm3kQDFrm96O3raYYbym Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUATPG4Kue/yOyVhhEJAQKXSw/+MTz0QZybjfHhJb3khjR3BMT4T6Qx1xM7 Kp4QKIlbMkqlpP75LOLoXJikseLdj9GVef5THbDzYWL5rVN5QOz3X5yUsYknDa2c DUcazqVxT7EblTUH1tlQtH4Evr4Zu0hHkVyuwFsfKU8MN/JonSDMwpsbIEJER1GV oSrDW6TcGZSQsox/Tr9leRS13QjLCgzcqBR6rLed2+oT0k4GUCFYg1cFhYavhof+ RG0yMKJMjVHdcJjOa+TEolNtNhL1CJW2LysRCbHauZyLe48/X2xNNQsnfBiEUZ/l We9nw4Bl8ha7Jpaa4ovnx1iN/MWv/mI5fwNOs1rEwxaB7Dw24CNIa87xhsbTy7AD CnxpbrX5BowwTeQY/7SbemHP/P6aCwWhL3bcFlNV0JyLUudS02iIteUG/paywyC3 QTuAAlSlCOtbF6DEc8yX0Lu8htuL6yT4OmE7qC+fSrdV/2rqOD5cyR313eMbPlCj 3MvV+atSGn0K+So/MqlQfk9VMNwLcQSBNDe32fIplDL5WF+5k1Cy5UcBzbZY2v5U Thch5Rm70kkSYm14yLhJDd4RMwkUypQ1uXCEXjj8BnnGUngLngY7ytLbz7eetneu XWnzP7pvynzouvOKJxZB1QwNw3HB0wkAvWR1Ri/wZpalrNLqfsllyqo9unCic0cX OxX2vwUuveg= =cFXq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-rm3kQDFrm96O3raYYbym--