From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: John Haxby <john.haxby@oracle.com>
Cc: NetDev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Subject: Re: inet_hash_connect: source port allocation
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:21:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1291058487.3435.1391.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1291057655.3435.1363.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Le lundi 29 novembre 2010 à 20:07 +0100, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> Le lundi 29 novembre 2010 à 19:46 +0100, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> > Le lundi 29 novembre 2010 à 18:29 +0000, John Haxby a écrit :
> >
> > > Sorry, I think I phrased my question badly.
> > >
> > > inet_csk_get_port() starts its search for a free port with
> > >
> > > smallest_rover = rover = net_random() % remaining + low;
> > >
> > > whereas __inet_hash_connect() basically misses out that call to
> > > net_random() so you get a predictable port number.
> > >
> > > Is there any good reason why that is the case?
> > >
> >
> > It seems random select was done at bind() time only in commit
> > 6df716340da3a6f ([TCP/DCCP]: Randomize port selection)
> >
> > It probably should be done in autobind too.
> >
> >
>
> I'll test following patch :
Oh well, forget this, there is something about inet_sk_port_offset()
using secure_ipv4_port_ephemeral()
We want to avoid reusing same port too fast.
http://www.tcpipguide.com/free/t_TCPIPClientEphemeralPortsandClientServerApplicatio-2.htm
Port is predictable only for same destination, and if no other
connections are attempted by other threads.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-29 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-29 17:04 inet_hash_connect: source port allocation John Haxby
2010-11-29 17:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-29 18:29 ` John Haxby
2010-11-29 18:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-29 19:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-29 19:21 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-11-29 19:38 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1291058487.3435.1391.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=john.haxby@oracle.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox